Kosaka and Xie

[Ahem. Update: this was just wrong, because I misread the defn of POGA-C; see comment 2, thanks to TC. To avoid polluting the record, I'll delete the rest of this post, but there's an archived copy at http://www.webcitation.org/6JMTX0nGx if you like. The paper fairy has now delivered a copy of K+X to me, so I expect to post a "take 2" later this evening. Or maybe tomorrow; I might actually try reading it properly this time.]

I have a take 2 if you're interested, but its dull.

More like this

This is my take 2. See here for my incautious take 1. Take 2 is not as interesting as take 1 - I no longer have an overall theme, and I don't feel inclined to contradict the take-home message. That reduces me to quibbling and a slight feeling of unease, though that may quite possibly be because I…
A somewhat unfair title; the person in question is Marcel Leroux and the "death" is the deletion of his wiki page. The "sales" is his wacko views on GW. I don't think ML is particularly interesting - wiki certainly thought not - but perhaps the way wiki deals with minor characters is. Background:…
[This is a copy of http://mustelid.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/septics-and-skeptics-denialists-…, put here for my convenience. I'll give it an old post date. I don't know if it will show up as "new" on the feed.] An astute reader might well ask why I write "septic" where you might expect me to write "…
Various wild excitement about methane emissions from the Arctic shelf... Hot Topic, Inel and The Indescribably Overhyped, which latter reveals "exclusively" what Magnus translated several weeks ago. Inel, very sensibly, asks for context: what are we to make of "millions of tons of a gas 20 times…

John N-G did a nice, simple treatment of this a year or so ago. I've been surprised that it hasn't received much attention, though to my knowledge he never published it formally:


[That's not quite the same "this" as we're talking about here, but it is a very nice analysis of the impact of El Nino / La Nina on temperature trend. I think I prefer it to the Foster+Rahmstorf method, because of concerns I've seen http://troyca.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/another-reconstruction-of-underl… -W]

By American Idiot (not verified) on 02 Sep 2013 #permalink

William, Tamino describes POGA-C as holding forcings constant at 1990 levels, while constraining the Tropical East Pacific to historical temperatures, ie, the reverse of your description. You may want to double check that.

[Oh, err, that's a good point, I'd completely missed that. I had better check. It would blow something of a hole in my argument :-) -W]

By Tom Curtis (not verified) on 02 Sep 2013 #permalink


That analysis actually got a lot of typically wrong-headed attention from the bozos over at WUWT. It was somewhat hilarious.