Antient ice

I don't see anyone else blogging this, so I will, even though it is old news. Record-shattering 2.7-million-year-old ice core reveals start of the ice ages says Science, but you have to immeadiately know the caveat: it isn't a continuous 2.7 Myr core. In fact, before long you discover that it's kinda the same thing as Atmospheric composition 1 million years ago from blue ice in the Allan Hills, Antarctica from PNAS, 2015, which I also unaccountably failed to blog or see blogged.

So, stepping back: rather than take a core vertically through relatively undisturbed ice, which is what Vostok or EPICA did, these folks have deliberately selected an area where the ice is flowing, bringing old ice near to the surface. And as it happens they drilled horizontally. So, you kinda get potluck for whatever you pull out. And as you can see from the figure (from the 1 Myr 2015 paper) it is much less fun to interpret (if it isn't obvious: what you get is the box with the rounded edges, and the dots inside): their Argon dating only gives them age to within ~100 kyr; and they can't pull out a continuous record, they just get a range.

1 Myr is only just outside the previous 800 kyr. 2.7 Myr is older; still, you'll notice that the Science article, while gushing, doesn't actually say much. Neither does their conference abstract: The old ice can be binned into three age groups: 1 Ma, 1.5 Ma, and 2+ Ma, disturbed by layers of ≤800 ka ice. This age-depth relationship indicates large-scale disturbance in the ice stratigraphy, reinforcing the concept of climate snapshots instead of time-series. Three climate proxies (Xe/Kr, δDice, and pCH4) fall within the range of variations in the recent 100-kyr glacial cycles, but with reduced variability. Hopefully, there will be more later.

Refs

* Now I "remember": it was CR who first pointed this out. Which has just made it's way to wiki.

More like this

A quiet day today (just as well after dinner and drinks last night with reprobate Jeff Ridley and somewhat more respectable John Turner). A bit of ice core stuff in the morning - using d-c-13 to understand glacial methane sources; trying to understand the 41kyr/100kyr switch in ice age cycles. Pic…
10Be evidence for the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the EPICA Dome C ice core slipped by me when it was published last year (Nature 444, 82-84 (2 November 2006)). If they are correct, then its nice for the ice core folk because it provides an absolute tie-point into the marine records.…
Guest posting by (or rather, ripped from) Eric Wolff. It is indeed a very fundamental question about whether the CO2 leads or lags the temperature. If there was somewhere in the ice core record where CO2 increases and temperature does not, then our understanding of the greenhouse effect must be…
Its evident that some people are still confused by the T/CO2 relationship, so I'll have another go in fairly simple terms. Let me start with the "official" position, if you like. There are two cases: the current one, where we're pumping out CO2; and the ice age one, where CO2 varies naturally.…

Is the title mispelled?

[I take my spelling of "ancient" from Hobbes, because it sounds better :-) -W]

By David B. Benson (not verified) on 28 Aug 2017 #permalink

Tried googling for more info, found this:
https://conservativemedia.com/politics/report-al-gores-persistent-fraud…
REPORT: Al Gore’s Persistent Fraud Exposed By A 2.7 Million-Year-Long Ice
Looks like an RS blog post

[Um, it isn't quite clear what that post is trying to say (other than "Al Gore is phat", but they already knew that). Their logic is so garbled that I can't even tell what error they're making -W]

They are going to have to find multiple sites to get more snapshots. I can't imagine the unconformities are uniform in time throughout the Blue Ice region.