Luskin & BPR3

Readers may have seen the minor brouhaha over at bpr3.org about Casey Luskin (DI-flack extraordinaire) using the BPR3 icon on a post without registering with ResearchBlogging.org. When this was pointed out to Luskin, he then registered with the site, a move that lead to much discussion. Now Dave Munger - the administrator of ResearchBlogging.org - has announced that Luskin’s registration will be denied. I’m not going to take a stance on this, but want to highlight a comment by Andrea Bottaro:

[L]et Luskin use the bpr3 logo, but add the general requirement that anyone using it should allow open comments/trackbacks on their site, and/or specifically allow a trackback to their post from a discussion/critique thread on this site. Then let actual peer-review run its course.

My bet is that Luskin will just reject the offer, and take the logo off. EN&V is scared stiff of open discussion.

I think this is a great idea. If a poster isn’t willing to open themselves up to peer-review than they don’t deserve to get the benefits of the BPR3 community. But since, Evolution News and Views and all the other DI/ARN-sponsored "blogs" actively prevent readers setting Luskin and his buddies straight (or if they do, threads mysteriously disappear) such peer-review will be about as welcome as light to a cockroach.

More like this

Last week I linked to Carl Zimmer's take down of Casey Luskin.
The Discovery Institute's Evolution News and Views blog neither reports news on evolution nor offers interesting views.
Welcome to the club, Chris Mooney...
MarkH notes that Luskin is upset about what they perceive as academic discrimination against the proponents of intelligent design creationism. So he asks Luskin a question:

Yes - if you're going to criticise something, then you have an obligation to be open to criticism yourself. Fair is fair.

--Simon