On Airlines and Safety

With the recent tragic loss of over 150 lives in Madrid, the following strikes me ...

American Airlines deliberately flew two planes 58 times in December that it knew had broken parts and thus could be unsafe in certain situations. For this - and improper drug and alcohol testing - the FAA fined the company $7.1M. That, frankly, is ridiculous.

American should have been put out of business. Yes, air travel is safer than any other form of travel, but when accidents happen they can, and do, have large death tolls. If a company puts its customers at risk, that company should not be allowed operate. It is really that simple.

(Incidentally, both the Madrid disaster and the AA incident involved MD-80 series aircraft.)

Tags

More like this

Ms. Madeline Loftus, 24, was just one of the 50 individuals who lost their lives on February 12, 2009 when Continental Flight 3407 crashed in a neighborhood near Buffalo, NY. The NTSB investigation and a frightening PBS Frontline investigation called "Flying Cheap" identified airline industry…
I don't fly as much as I used to but I still fly too often for my likes and when the cart comes around for the free beverages it's either orange juice "with no ice" or a bloody mary mix "with no ice." I rarely drink water, but if I did, I would never drink the water out of a pitcher, as offered to…
D-Day was today in 1944. My father was involved. Wikipedia is silly. Kids these days have no idea. There is, of course, a classic movie on the topic. [A timely repost] What does "D-Day" mean? The term "D-Day" is military for "The Day" just like "H-Hour" is military for "The Hour" on which…
D-Day was today in 1944. My father was involved. Wikipedia is silly. Kids these days have no idea. There is, of course, a classic movie on the topic. The term "D-Day" is military for "The Day" just like "H-Hour" is military for "The Hour" on which something will happen. However, once D-Day…

Wow that is one tiny fine, they can shrug that off as just a cost of doing business. I think their fine should have been at least one order of magnitude higher that would give them a proper incentive to follow the rules.

They should not have fined the company - the shareholders were not at fault, they should have personally fined and jailed the responsible executives. That would stop this reocurring