Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time

I spent this morning at a workshop for K-12 biology teachers. The workshop was organized by the School of Life Sciences here at ASU and gave some 20 students to interact with faculty regarding teaching evolution. My presentation was titled "Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time" and aimed to educate the teachers regarding the Discovery Institute's "teach the strengths and weaknesses of evolution" approach post-Kitzmiller. Slides are below:

More like this

I’m quoted in a press release regarding a teacher training workshop (the “Evolution Challenges Workshop”) we’re giving at ASU to help middle and high school teachers teach evolution. Money quotes: Studies have shown that “16 percent of high school biology teachers are essentially young earth…
The following is an abstract from an article by Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education called “WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE "TEACH THE CONTROVERSY" SLOGAN?” available here. a repost Teachers are often exhorted by creationists to "teach the controversy." Although such encouragement…
When I was a post-doc, I spent a few months seriously thinking about changing careers and teaching high school. I might have followed through on that plan, too, but I didn't know how to pay for it. Today, if you have a background in science, technology, math, or engineering, you can retrain to…
The following is an abstract from an article by Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education called “WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE "TEACH THE CONTROVERSY" SLOGAN?” available here. a repost a repost Teachers are often exhorted by creationists to "teach the controversy." Although such…

Some of those quotes reminds me of something Jonathan Wells said a couple of years back.
"When we look at the evidence for darwinian evolution, its pathetic.
Its not overwhelming, its underwhelming. And as soon as people learn
that they will realise that darwinism is not good science, what it is
is the best natural explanation for what we see, but that doesnt make
it the real explanation for what we see. Its artificially constrained
by this materialistic philosophy that inspired this radical
redefinition of science in 2001. Without that radical redefinition of
science, if people are encouraged to follow the evidence, darwinism
will fall."