USDA Pesticide Info Disappearing

Over the past few years, itâs become harder to access several sources of useful, up-to-date information about the substances weâre exposed to. There were the EPA library closures; the changes in Toxics Release Inventory reporting requirements; and a dramatic slowdown in the pace of Integrated Risk Information System assessments. Now, the USDAâs National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) has announced it will not be collecting agricultural chemical usage data on 2008 field crops.

Today, 45 prominent public interest groups â including NRDC, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Consumers Union â have written to USDA Secretary Ed Shafer to urge the restoration of this important information:

NASSâs Agricultural Chemical Usage reports are the only reliable, publicly available source of data on pesticide and fertilizer use outside of California. Elimination of this program will severely hamper the efforts of the USDA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), land grant scientists, and state officials to perform pesticide risk assessments and make informed policy decisions on pesticide use. In particular, USDA and EPA will have difficulty tracking their progress in meeting their policy commitments to reduce the use of hazardous pesticides through adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices and to support IPM research.

Many of the undersigned organizations are regular, and in some cases heavy, users of pesticide data from the NASS program. In addition, we all depend upon NASSâs objective data to educate the public about pesticide use and represent the public interest in pesticide and pest management policy decisions.

[â¦]

NASSâs objective and reliable data are critical to sound policy decisions on pesticide use. They are also the only publicly available resource to counter misinformation about pesticide usage and trends in American agriculture.

This decision might have been made in order to save money, but the result will be less information for those working to protect human health and the environment.

More like this

I'm harping on the same string.  A month ago, I href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/05/poisoning_ourselves.php">noted how it was not necessary for terrorists to figure out how to poison us.  Our own companies are doing it for them.  Now, our government is doing a heck of a job to…
If the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) give their approval to a new herbicide called Enlist Duo and to corn and soybean seeds genetically engineered (GE) to resist that chemical, the United States could see a significant increase in what is already…
It’s only natural that during a crisis we look to single, “silver bullet” technical solutions, after all, they are supposed to be effective against werewolves, witches, and other monsters. For monsters like the ongoing severe California drought, the current favorite silver bullet is seawater…
Despite substantial public opposition and the “grave concerns” of about 50 members of Congress and significant unanswered questions about human and environmental health impacts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved a new herbicide called Enlist Duo for use on genetically…

In addition, please not the Union of Concerned Scientists
Action Center web page :>

Take Action: The EPA Closes Its Libraries, Destroys Documents
The EPA Closes Its Libraries, Destroys Documents.
... Union of Concerned Scientists Action Center ...
http://ucsaction.org/campaign/12_5_06_EPA_Shuts_Down_Libraries

Regards,

Tom Krohmer
Environmental Technologist
http://toxicreverend.blogspot.com/
aka
The Toxic Reverend
http://www.myspace.com/toxicreverend