Next step for Chao's Secret Rule

Hmph!   I just read on the OMB/OIRA website that they have completed their review of Labor Secretary Chao's proposal to change the way that OSHA and MSHA assess workers' risk of health hazards.  The OIRA website notice says their review was completed on August 25, and it was approved "consistent with change." 

Well, I guess I didn't really expect Secretary Chao or one of her political associates to call me personally to discuss the August 14 letter that 80 public health scientists sent to her.  In that letter, we urged Elaine Chao to withdraw her proposal from OMB review.  I wonder whether she read our letter, or the letter from Georges Benjamin, MD sent on behalf of the American Public Health Association.  I think not.

I was secretly hoping that the Labor Department would have received one of OIRA director Susan Dudley's notorious "return letters."   This is a letter that OMB sends back to agencies with a recommendation that the agency head "reconsider" the proposal.  For example:

"Such a return may occur if the quality of the agency's analyses is inadequate, if the regulatory standards adopted are not justified by the analyses, if the rule is not consistent with the regulatory principles stated in EO 12866 or with the President's policies and priorities, or if the rule is not compatible with other Executive Orders or statutes.  ...the return letter explains why OIRA believes that the rulemaking would benefit from further consideration by the agency."

HMPH!  They really didn't read the scientists' letter, did they?

It specifically explains why the proposal is "not compatible with statutues."  It's NOT compatible with two statutes: the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 AND the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1970.

It also explains why the proposal is "not justified by the analyses" and why the "quality of the agency's analyses is inadequate."

In the (bad) old days of OMB, a solid proposal rule and analyses submitted by OSHA would be dissected and scrutinize by desk officers, often taking more than 90 days for a review.

Now, in these (really bad) days of OMB under the G.W. Bush Administration, a piece of shoddy analysis with illogical regulatory text sails through OMB review, delivered straight back to Secretary's Chao's desk.  It probably has a pretty Republican ribbon affixed on the top.  

Seriously folks.  Things in this town are messed up.


For a chronology of events related to Secretary Chao's secret rule, click here for the SKAPP website.

More like this

Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Congressman George Miller (D-CA) are demanding answers from Labor Secretary Elaine Chao on her mysterious proposed rule on risk assessment.  I reported earlier this week that the Secretary's office sent a proposed rule to OMB on July 7 entitled "Requirements…
With an announcement today in the Federal Register, Labor Secretary Solis' OSHA is moving in a new direction to address occupational exposure to diacetyl.  The butter-flavoring agent is associated with respiratory harm, including bronchiolitis obliterans.  Just six days ago, Ronald Kuiper, 69…
Updated below ( 6/18/08 ) Earlier this month I wrote in "Crashing Cranes, Deaths and the White House's Edict" about the inexcusable inaction by the US Department of Labor and OSHA to address the decades-old problem of crane-related deaths.  I am not alone in my disgust at this regulatory system…
[See update at end of post] The OMB website which lists those rules currently under review by OIRA has a new item today: something from OSHA on Diacetyl.   (See this screenshot for the OMB listing, and this reference to the rule on  You'll recall this is the butter-flavoring…

So, sue Chao and D of L. Quit complaining. Take the next step.

Thanks, Celeste, for keeping us so informed so fast. Round 2 coming up!

To "Rich" above:
Are you offering legal services? I'm not a lawyer so if you have ideas under what grounds a lawsuit could be based, I'd be interested in hearing them.

By Celeste Monforton (not verified) on 27 Aug 2008 #permalink

P.S. To "Rich" above,
Do you have money to fund a lawsuit?

By Celeste Monforton (not verified) on 27 Aug 2008 #permalink