Protecting the Public from Dangerous Products â Whatâs Next?

Members of the media are gravely enumerating all the challenging circumstances that President-Elect Obama faces (financial collapse, two wars, global climate disruption, etc), so itâs worth noting that this is also a tough time for product safety. Recent problems with lead in childrenâs toys, contaminated food, and tainted drugs have demonstrated how many holes exist in our systems for ensuring product safety, and Chinaâs melamine problem highlights how problematic it can be to rely on countries whose safety mechanisms are even weaker.

Hereâs a quick review of where things stand:

The Consumer Product Safety Commission  got expanded powers â some of which itâs already put to good use â and additional money from major legislation passed in August. Replacing the current CPSC chair, who said sheâd rather not have that much additional muscle, with someone whoâs more committed to consumer safety should help put those resources to good use.

Earlier this year, Congress essentially pressured the FDA into admitting that it needed more money (under a Bush administration rule federal employees canât criticize the presidentâs budget), and gave it an additional $300 million. The FDA has announced plans to open offices in China, but the promised money and the new plans are not yet at the scale needed to tackle todayâs challenges. The New York Timesâ Gardiner Harris gives an excellent overview of the grim situation in this recent article.

DC-area folks who follow product-safety issues might be interested in a symposium on dangerous products at the American University Washington College of Law on Friday, November 14th. It involves presentations entitled âThe Social Costs of Dangerous Products: An Empirical Investigationâ and âUnavailable and Unaccountable: A Free Ride for Foreign Manufacturers of Defective Goods,â as well as two panel discussions, one featuring our own David Michaels. Registration is free (or $35 for those who want CLE credit); go to American Universityâs website for more information or to register.

Product safety is easy to forget when there are so many pressing issues demanding immediate attention. But the new Congress and the Obama administration should spend some time thinking about strengthening our product-safety systems â preferably before another person dies from a faulty crib, a contaminated drug, or a tainted salad.

More like this

We've been following the crescendo of stories illustrating the severe limitations of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (here, here, and here): CPSC lacks the resources to test products adequately, it canât levy hefty enough fines to deter corporate wrongdoing, and it can announce a recall…
On Thursday, the Senate approved legislation that will boost funding for the Consumer Product Safety Commission, increase the agencyâs enforcement power, and effectively ban lead in all childrenâs products. The House bill passed in December contained similar provisions, although that chamber raised…
By Liz Borkowski  Reports of toys and other products containing dangerous levels of lead continue to pour in, with Curious George dolls and lipstick being the latest items to come under scrutiny. Companies and health officials have to decide what to do about products currently on the market, and…
The recent recalls of dangerous toys and defective cribs have received a great deal of press attention, but closer analysis reveals that consumer product recalls are generally ineffective at getting most defective products out of consumersâ homes. In many cases, the vast majority of the dangerous…