CEOs See Global Warming as a Threat to Business

But not in the way you might think.

Bay Area CEOs think global warming is a threat to local business, according to a survey from the Bay Area Council.

The survey, released Thursday, said 77 percent of Bay Area chief executives who responded think that environmental warming is a serious threat to the local economy and to the region's quality of life. Just 6 percent of CEOs in the study said it wasn't at all a serious problem.

The council polled 510 Bay Area CEOs and top executives for the study. Those who responded overwhelmingly supported legislation to require cuts in pollution that could raise the atmospheric temperature. One third of them said they knew of business opportunities connected to global warming and restrictions on pollution.

That's the spirit, you wonderful San Franciscans.

There's money to be made in creating ethical options for consumers. It's refreshing to see business folks acknowledge the actual physical threat of climate change instead of the politicians' fear of the threat of "alarmism." The latter threat is usually described as the great destroyer of industry by many conservatives - including folks like the Ayn Randians and the Southern Baptist Council - but here we have the majority of Bay Area business leaders saying just the opposite.

We all talk about a change - in business, in politics, in religion, in response to our environmental problems - and we should continue working towards one, but if the change comes too rapidly, we could find ourselves in an equally precarious situation. Thud made this all too clear in a response to Ed's post about ethanol and Pimentel:

Two things become clear. First, the science is so incredibly politicized at the moment that it's nearly impossible for a lay-person to sort out. Especially if you rely on reading other people's characterizations of the research...

Second, no matter what we do, it's going to cause a significant amount of economic and political upheaval. Replacing oil upsets everyone's apple cart and is going to have carryover effects we haven't even begun to think about yet. And just replacing it probably won't be sufficient because that will have environmental costs of its own, and those are also horribly unclear. Even monkeying around the edges here with ethanol has agitated the economy of the western hemisphere.

It's enough to make a body anxious.

It's enough to make a body write.

More like this

A little over a week ago the Environmental Protection Agency sent the White House its finding that global warming endangers public health and welfare. This doesn't sound like news, and except for a minority of scientists out there it is very, very old news. But in the context of a 2007 Supreme…
by revere, cross-posted from Effect Measure A little over a week ago the Environmental Protection Agency sent the White House its finding that global warming endangers public health and welfare. This doesn't sound like news, and except for a minority of scientists out there it is very, very old…
This is just one of dozens of responses to common climate change denial arguments, which can all be found at How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic. Objection: Scientists claim that Global Warming from GHG's is actually being countered somewhat by Global Dimming from aerosol pollution. They even say…
The Australian's Cut and Paste column is notorious for its dishonest quote mining, but today they went one step further into quote doctoring. Here's the quote that they present as contradicting the Prime Minister's quote: Julia Gillard at a press conference on Monday: The science is telling us that…

A colleague of mine who works at a non-profit sent this website to me: www.svn.org/imaginewhatsnext . I'm trying to start a non-profit myself and I can use all the help I can get! I thought I would pass it along if anyone was interested.

Yes, it very much is is

refreshing to see business folks acknowledge the actual physical threat of climate change instead of the politicians' fear of the threat of "alarmism."

. Managers at the US National Weather Service were so fear-full of what others might think as "alarmism" that they refused to allow their staffs to even talk about global warming. It was sickening!