Remote Control Metal Detector

i-aab8b7607a2a190a9e55162fafebaab6-metsokbil.jpg

Here's a funny toy: a remote-controlled car with a built-in metal detector. Drive it over a piece of metal and it'll go BEEP and light up. It doesn't have anything like serious ground penetration, but still, a cool toy.

There are several reasons that metal detecting has not been made into a mechanised remote sensing technique. I guess the main one is that only archaeologists would have any use for such a machine, and we don't have the money to make it worthwhile to develop and market it. Also, while building a mechanised detector and find mapper would be easy, it would be considerably more tricky to equip it with a sensitive digging mechanism that could get finds out of the ground and bag them without damaging them.

Thanks to Hans for the tip.

[More blog entries about , , , ; , , , ,]

More like this

Many senior Swedish archaeologists are afraid of metal detectors and uncomfortable with the idea that the public might have access to such machines. Likewise with information about the locations, or even the existence, of newly made metal detector finds. "Keep it quiet or you'll attract looters."…
Spent 5.5 hours on site in Wales today and 7 hours by car, train and plane to get from there to Skavsta airport. I've got another couple of hours by bus and train before I'm home. The trains I rode in the UK were on time but often did not leave from the platforms indicated by the online trip…
Had a beautiful day in the field with Per Vikstrand today. He has a new metal detector, a C-scope 1220R, and it seemed to work very well. Not that the stuff we found was terribly interesting: four man-hours in the Field of St. Olaf garnered us only a flint chip and a piece of slag apart from the…
Frag of a lion-shaped badge with a rivet used to fix it to some surface. Photograph Tobias Bondesson. Another day of fruitful fieldwork, with friendly landowners and pretty good weather. We started out with 20 man-hours in the fields around a fortified hilltop settlement in Tingstad parish. The…

Well, one market for it other than archaeology would be finding unexploded ordnance. Without, you know, exposing people to the risk of getting blown up. Maybe the manufacturer should branch out a little.

Metal detectors were originally invented to find land mines in World War II. They are still used extensively for demining -- they are cheap and training is not too hard, although there are many false alarms per unit of area cleared. Most times, neutralizing a land mine also involves digging up a fragile object and transporting it to a safer area for later processing.

By Michael Poole (not verified) on 05 Dec 2007 #permalink

... neutralizing a land mine also involves digging up a fragile object and transporting it to a safer area ...

Yes, and that procedure has not been successfully mechanised.

I'd want to add a GPS receiver and some software to automate a mapping grid. I don't think it needs to do the digging itself, got to leave something for the grad students.

NASA should buy some of these to search for gold on Mars.

By Tegumai Bopsul… (not verified) on 06 Dec 2007 #permalink

Perhaps this could be a way of getting more children hooked on archeology - get 'em young! :-)

/ Mattias

I know that, at least where I dug in the past, there were so many small metal objects that metal detecting wasn't really worth it anyway.
Now if you could motorize a magnetometery set up and just auto-map sites, that would be pretty cool. It would have to be able to go up and down hills and stuff though. So relatively hard.

I've done some fieldwork with people from the Swedish National Heritage Board who are developing a motorised magnetometer. You still have to drive the thing, though.