More "Tonya Harding" Legal Tactics from the Administration

It looks like the administration is continuing to use one of their favorite tactics in the war on terror - handicap the defense by intimidating their lawyers before they get into the courtroom. Ed Brayton calls this the "Tonya Harding strategy," and he's right - the government wants to win, and they're not above putting a cheap hit in if they think it'll increase their chances.

Earlier this year, a senior pentagon official publicly suggested that companies should boycott law firms that provide pro bono defense to Gitmo detainees. That particular escapade did nothing for them. It outraged (rightly) a wide range of groups, and resulted in the eventual resignation of the idiot who made the statements. Apparently, the administration learned a lesson from that.

Unfortunately, it was the wrong lesson.

The message that the administration seems to have received was just that wholesale intimidation is a bad idea - so now they're trying retail intimidation, one lawyer at a time.

There are now widespread reports stating that Col. Morris Davis told an Australian newspaper earlier this weekend that he felt that the behavior of the defense lawyer, Major Michael Mori, was inappropriate. After citing a specific section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice that prohibits "contemptuous words," Davis said that it would be up to the Marines to decide whether actual criminal charges were warranted. As Mori points out, it becomes difficult to provide the best possible defense if you have to try and figure out how much your advice is being driven by a desire to avoid criminal charges.

This administration continues to demonstrate that they view the rule of law not as an ideal to live up to, but as an inconvenience to dodge. Way to "preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution, guys.

More like this

What do you do with a lawyer who attacks detention without charge, who defends habeus corpus, denies that retrospective legislation should apply, and criticises the thinness of evidence against his client? You'd give him a legal award, wouldn't you? After all, he is defending not only his client…
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Hamdan case was that it was argued not by a prominent legal scholar or law professor, nor by a private defense attorney, but by a military lawyer from the JAG office, Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift. Think about the position this put him in as an officer, taking a…
Looks like even some Republicans are breaking ranks: The Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday voted 15-9 to recommend a bill -- over the objections of the Bush administration -- that would authorize tribunals for terror suspects in a way that it says would protect suspects' rights. The bill…
Charles Swift, the JAG lawyer who bravely defended Hamdan and won his case before the Supreme Court, was denied a promotion and now must leave the Navy: Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, 44, will retire in March or April under the military's"up or out"promotion system. Swift said last week he was notified…

The local news is reporting that Mori will be charged. I have enormous respct and admiration for Mori - he has called a spade a spade, as we say here, from the very beginning, arguing that Hicks is illegally detained, is being tortured, that the military commissions are a farce, and criticising everyone from the President down, which is not a good career move for a military lawyer. He shows the very best of our legal system, and ought to be given a Freedom Medal, in my view.

The local news is most likely wrong in this case - the prosecutor who made the accusations is an Air Force lawyer, and does not have the authority to bring charges against Mori himself. The New York Times quotes the senior defense lawyer and mori's supervisor, a marine colonel, as saying that Mori's behavior has been absolutely proper.