New Polling Data Suggests Americans Really Ticked Off At Entire Financial Sector

I'm no Nate Silver, but I do enjoy reading polls. Most media reports give you the high points - approval numbers, disapproval numbers, that sort of thing. If take a few minutes to dig a little deeper, you'll often find things that didn't make the highlights, but are still very interesting. Case in point: the most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll (pdf).

Fourteen pages into the poll, we find the following question:

I'm going to read you some news stories regarding various people and organizations that you may have heard about over the past two to three months. Please tell me which one or two of these people or organizations have most upset you by what they have done or the example they have set.

Bank executives taking large bonuses when they are receiving federal funds

Mortgage lenders making loans to people who would have trouble paying them back

The CEO of Merrill Lynch spending one million dollars to redecorate his office

Corporations holding meetings at spas and resort locations when they are receiving federal funds

CEOs of auto companies traveling in private jets to ask Congress for federal funds

Obama cabinet nominees who failed to pay their taxes

If you look at the list, you'll see that "all of the above" was not actually one of the options that the respondents were given. But it came in third anyway. An impressive 21% of the sample, when asked to pick one of those items, responded by saying that all of those things are equally upsetting.

If you are - just hypothetically, of course - some sort of trader working on some sort of trading floor, and some loudmouth asks you if you want to help pay for the mortgages of "losers", you might want to keep those results in mind before you do something that might further erode your industry's already non-existant approval rating.

More like this

With Big Shitpile rolling on, there's been a lot of discussion about the ethics of defaulting on a home mortgage. Several people have commented on the hypocrisy of denigrating homeowners for doing the same thing that businesses do, without any moral qualms, so I won't say any more about that here…
Ok, another batch of questions have come in, all variants on the same theme. The question is, if mortgages are at the root of the current economic disaster, how can it possibly result in close to a trillion dollars worth of losses? It definitely seems strange, on two different levels. On an…
With the insanity that's been going on in the financial world lately, a bunch of people have asked me to post a followup to my earlier posts on the whole mortgage disaster, to try to explain what's going on lately. As I keep saying when people ask me things like this, I'm not an economist. I don'…
Ian Welsh makes a very important connection between personal economic incentives and corporate behavior: What would you do, or rather, what wouldn't you do, if you knew that by working hard for five years you'd have enough money that you need never, ever, work again for the rest of your life? Not…

I'd have said #2. When you originate a mortage you create new money. That money is created on the assumption that the asset(s) and cash flow(s) the underwrite the loan are "money's worth." So when you originate mortgages that you know (or should know) aren't justified by the underlying cash flows and assets, you're essentially counterfeiting money for speculative purposes.

Although #1 comes a very, very close second. But privatising profit and socialising risk has become so routine by now that it fails to upset me emotionally anymore.

- Jake