Scientific American does - and they have new info on whether pseudonymity really decreases blogger credibility.
A. I am so glad I was on hiatus during the whole Pepsigate thing. Whew.
B. I have been dying to write about blogger pseudonymity like, forever, and NO ONE WANTS TO HEAR IT. WAAAAAH.
C. Okay! All better now!
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Recently, Scienceblogs/National Geographic decided it would no longer host pseudonymous science bloggers. As a result, many of my former colleagues have left. I think this decision was wrong. Read on for my reasons.
One: simple fairness. Several well-established pseudonymous bloggers had been…
Seems appropriate since controversial topics like vaccines are on the agenda this week.
A study published in EHP finds that high fluoride (mean of 8.3 mg/L) or arsenic in water decreases IQ (it's very rare to have a fluoride level this high in the US, artificial fluoridation is supposed to be 0.7-1…
Pencils ready? Here's a quick quiz; circle all that apply*:
1. You're a scientist and you've just published some research in a peer reviewed journal. You want:
a. Scientists in your field to read and discuss your work.
b. Interested non-scientists to get the important bits of what you found and…
UPDATED:
Happy to announce that @Dnlee5 post is now back up: http://t.co/XVentvp35T #SciAmBlogs
— Bora Zivkovic (@BoraZ) October 14, 2013
This is a very interesting and important question, and it probably requires more context than I have the ability or time to give, but I think it is worth…