Secular Scorecard

If you're like many SciBlog readers you probably have an interest in just how well your elected representatives are truly representing you, whether it's concerning stem cell research, same-sex marriage, church-state separation issues, or what-have-you. For convenient one stop shopping, take a trip over to secular.org, specifically, to their congressional scorecard. You can see a country-wide overview, find the votes for individual representatives, and read details of specific bills. From the web site:

The roll call votes used by the Secular Coalition for America in these scorecards are designed to illustrate the commitment of our elected officials to the secular character of our government and the protection of freedom for all Americans.

It should come as no surprise that only seven reps in the House achieved a 100% rating (all Democrats). In contrast, 163 members of the House achieved a score of zero. Yes, zero. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Squatoomies. In the Senate, 50 members had the distinction of ranking either zero or one correct vote. The null-score Senators included throwback-Brownback of Kansas, the lunatic twins from Oklahoma (Inhofe and Coburn), and my favorite pair o' pinheads, Cornyn of Texas and Santorum of Pennsylvania.

More like this

From a press release (via e-mail): U.S. Congressional Scorecards 109th Congress: Washington, D.C. - The Secular Coalition for America (SCA) today released its House and Senate Scorecards of the 109th Congress. The SCA, an advocacy group for atheists, humanists, freethinkers, and other nontheists,…
It appears that Connecticut is on the verge of passing a bill that allows civil unions for gay couples in that state. It would be the first state to do so without any judicial order requiring it. The AP reports that the state Senate took up the bill today and Democratic leaders say they have the…
The Republican dominated Minnesota Legislature got almost nothing done over the last two years that they were in power. But they did manage to put two boneheaded constitutional amendments on the ballot for last November, one to restrict voting rights in a way that Republicans would have a better…
The Specter-Harkin Amendment passed the Senate, but this does not guarantee an increase to the NIH budged. The House must still vote on it and it must be reflected in House and Senate Appropriations Committees' allocation for the Labor-Health and Human Services Appropriations Committee. (Don't…