Change.gov, Boyle's Public Domain

Hope all the Americans had a good holiday, and that the rest of the world finds peace in a troubled week. To my friends in India and Pakistan, to my colleagues at the Internet Governance Forum this week in Hyderabad...my thoughts are with you all.

Two quick links of much importance in my world:

1. Obama's transition site is under CC-BY.

Via Lessig's blog:

Consistent with the values of any "open government," and with his strong leadership on "free debates" from the very start, the Obama team has modified the copyright notice on change.gov to embrace the freest CC license.

Wow. Obama's team, in the midst of so much other stuff going on, gets the little things right. I for one look forward to a few years of government that gets the little things right, because it augurs well for the big things. Compare this to the copyright maximalism of the past administration (and for what it's worth, other administrations - this is not a partisan thing, but mainly a perspective thing - are you looking at Hollywood or at the Internet for your point of view?) and it's hard not to smile.

2. James Boyle's The Public Domain

Prof. Boyle has released The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. I have had the great honor to work with Jamie for almost half a decade. He's funny, he's warm, and he's about the best Board member a guy could have. He's also got a wicked editor's pen - I once got a draft document back with more text of his in red than my original in black, and he'd only gotten halfway through before ending with "just start over" and sending on to me. I owe him a lot.

But that's not the reason I'm telling you to buy his book.

Jamie's written a book here that makes a compelling argument, one that lies at the heart of the Science Commons project. It's that, in a digital world, we need a different way to think about intellectual property. Just as it is vital to understand a bit about our environment, or employment law, it's vital to understand a bit about the public domain. And like our environment, it needs some protection.

We have built our IP systems on the metaphor of physical property systems. Fences. But we don't have an Environmental Protection Agency for IP. Nor do we have national parks, or escrow for wetlands, or any other kind of regulating factors that preserve the public interest in intellectual property. Fair use has been badly degraded, to the point that my favorite quote on this is that it's "the right to call your attorney."

In his new book, Jamie lays this all out in a way that is understandable to the non-lawyer. And he makes a passionate argument that we need an environmental movement in the intellectual property space. I agree. But even if you don't, I think you should read it and make an informed decision against - which you can do for free, since the book's online under a CC license. If you like the book I hope you buy a copy.

I bought two.

More like this

There's been some talk among the sciencebloggers about the idea of intellectual property, and href="http://www.scienceblogs.com/clock/">Bora over at "A Blog Around the Clock" asked me to convert my thoughts into a post. It's a serious topic, which is worth giving some deep consideration, and…
"The past can survive only if it can beat out the future" (p. 142) Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy by Laurence Lessig is a great and important book, one that should be read by anyone interested in the future of the Internet, culture and expression. This book is a plea…
Larry Lessig reports some exciting, huge and important news: free licenses upheld: So for non-lawgeeks, this won't seem important. But trust me, this is huge. I am very proud to report today that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (THE "IP" court in the US) has upheld a free (ok, they…
Many of us supported Barack Obama during the Presidential campaign, not because we agreed with all of his positions but we agreed with many of them that were crucial. We also saw no morally viable alternative. We hope to be able to continue our support, but it will always be offered in a…

The very phrase "Intellectual Property" is a nice bit of propaganda. It bypasses a number of very important questions: whether ideas are such things as can be property at all. Try replacing every instance of it - meantally - with "Patents, Trademarks, and Copyright".