Terrorism Index 2007

magazine has released the results of their
second survey of 100 foreign policy experts, on the topic of national
security.  The results are compiled into what they call the href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3700"
rel="tag">Terrorism Index.  Their sample
is bipartisan, with about 40% of the
participants identify themselves as conservative.  80% have
worked in Government, 26% in the military, 18% in intelligence.
 The results this year are
equally dismal.



i-bde8db8eea58480df9d44b4fd0ec4c03-Terrorism_index_2007.png




Eighty-eight
percent of the experts believe that the war in Iraq is having a
negative impact on U.S. national security. Just 19 percent of
respondents believe that the strategy of deploying more troops in
Baghdad is a good idea. Perhaps more importantly, 92 percent said that
the Bush administration's performance on Iraq has been below average,
with nearly 6 in 10 experts of all political stripes saying the Bush
administration is doing the "worst possible job" in Iraq.



Most
think that the war in Iraq is a distraction. Most think that it would
have made more sense to surge in Afghanistan instead of in Iraq.
 There has been a 30% decline in the number who think that the
war in Afghanistan has had a positive impact on US national security.
 A majority think that the US has made progress in two out of
four major goals suggested by the 9/11 Commission.



57% say that the Taliban is stronger this year than last.  The
numbers go on and on, but you get the picture.




More like this

The other day, as I was bemoaning the tanking of the dollar versus the Euro (yes, my European friends are not crying in their beer over it; I'm glad for them. Now they can visit), I mentioned that it wasn't just the dollar that had taken a bath since GWB but also the US reputation as a force for…
Take a good look at the chart above. This represents the increase in the number of troops in Afghanistan since 2001. The number of soldiers that are presently in country might be a little high on this chart, given that The New York Times estimates 68,000 soldiers currently in Afghanistan.…
Here is the most depressing lede of the day: $1.2 trillion would pay for an unprecedented public health campaign -- a doubling of cancer research funding, treatment for every American whose diabetes or heart disease is now going unmanaged and a global immunization campaign to save millions of…
Erik Svane says that the media is not reporting the good poll news from Iraq: Indeed, one reason that "the global image of America has slipped," that "pessimism about the future of Iraq was widespread," and that "Iraq is sapping good will to the United States" may be that they see so few polls from…