Jim Holt on Iraqi Oil

He alleges
that the war in Iraq was botched for a reason: it will be easier for us
to steal their oil if they do not have a functioning government.
 Some excerpts:



Indeed, the US may be
‘stuck’ precisely where Bush et al want it to be,
which is why there is no ‘exit strategy’.



The value of Iraqi oil, largely light
crude with low production costs, would be of the order of $30 trillion
at today’s prices. For purposes of comparison, the projected
total cost of the US invasion/occupation is around $1 trillion.



The draft law that the US has written for
the Iraqi congress would cede nearly all the oil to Western companies.
The Iraq National Oil Company would retain control of 17 of
Iraq’s 80 existing oilfields, leaving the rest –
including all yet to be discovered oil – under foreign
corporate control for 30 years.



How will the US maintain hegemony over
Iraqi oil? By establishing permanent military bases in Iraq. Five
self-sufficient ‘super-bases’ are in various stages
of completion. All are well away from the urban areas where most
casualties have occurred. There has been precious little reporting on
these bases in the American press, whose dwindling corps of
correspondents in Iraq cannot move around freely because of the
dangerous conditions.



There is more, of course, but you get the idea.



Tags

More like this

Yesterday, the Bush administration awoke from its long slumber and noticed that chaos overran Iraq plan in ’06, Bush team says. The Times story barely requires commentary: President Bush began 2006 assuring the country that he had a "strategy for victory in Iraq." He ended the year closeted with…
Who are these people, and what are they doing?  They are Democratic congresspersons, sheepishly "caving in".  Not only did they cave on the timeline for withdrawal of military and mercenary forces in Iraq, they failed to heed this warning: href="http://www.upi.com/Energy/Briefing/2007/05/24/…
A columnist for the St. Petersburg Times has a column on the mounting cost of the Iraq war. It's stunning to me that the "liberal media" hasn't made a bigger deal out of the fact that the White House was either completely clueless about what the war would require, in terms of both troop strength…
Environmental justice and the local conditions of energy production facilities: some of the most significant reasons to be concerned about the recent enthusiasm for new nuclear power facilities. Oil production and distribution in non-western locales is environmentally destructive. Why do we…

If you remember back to the precision missile and bomb attacks preceding the invasion, the Coalition of the Willing (Sick, eh?) destroyed principally civilian targets, not military targets. Rummy wiped out their phones, electrical power, water supply, transportation, and sewage system. The civil government collapsed, and criminals and warlords emerged as the new civil government.

The 'war' (actually 4+ years of occupation after the 6-week war) is supposedly against the insurgency, or al-Qaeda, or the ghost of Saddam, or whatever, but it is Iraqis we are killing, yet somehow the Iraqi people are our friends? Friends? Is that like allies? Do we put ammunition out as bait for Canada's poor children to 'select' them for our snipers as targets?

The whole thing is and was preposterous from the planning stages in the early days of the Project for a New American Century.

By Globle Warren … (not verified) on 12 Oct 2007 #permalink