Appropriate Taxes

I've rarely linked to Kos before; this is probably the
second time (I'm a liberal, just not that kind of
liberal).  However, the recent post on the reality of the Iraq
war demands some commentary.  Plus, there is no point in being
one out of >100 commenters.  Note: the href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/26/world/main3539432.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3539432">sub-quote
is from CBS News.





href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/26/17716/535">Freedom
Isn't Free. It charges interest.

by Kagro X

Mon Nov 26, 2007 at 02:17:41 PM PST



President Bush on Monday signed a deal setting
the foundation for a
potential long-term U.S. troop presence in Iraq, with details to be
negotiated over matters that have defined the war debate at home - how
many U.S. forces will stay in the country, and for how long.

The agreement between Mr. Bush and Iraqi Prime
Minister Nouri
al-Maliki confirms that the United States and Iraq will hash out an
"enduring" relationship in military, economic and political terms.

CBS News' Pete Gow in Baghdad reports the
proposals are to offer the
U.S. a continued military presence in Iraq, as well as favorable
business interests (such as investment opportunities for American
companies), in return for guarantees to Iraq's future security.

Breaking News: The Iraq war turns out to be about exactly
what you
thought it was about, even though people told you you were crazy and/or
a terrorist for thinking it...



Personally, I have no objection to the idea of the USA getting
"favorable
business interests," so long as those interests are taxed at an
appropriate rate.  Say, oh, somewhere around 100%.
 Seventy percent should go toward veteran's benefits and
compensation to Iraqis.  That should include realistic
compensation for the families of those killed or disabled in war.



I find it very difficult to find justification for anyone making a
profit from someone else's ultimate sacrifice.



More like this

From a news analysis by Sheryl Gay Stolberg in today's New York Times: By stepping up the American military presence in Iraq, President Bush is not only inviting an epic clash with the Democrats who run Capitol Hill. He is ignoring the results of the November elections, rejecting the central thrust…
Apparently, the Iraqis have moved to "Plan B", which is the dissolution of the Iraqi state. From the Independent: The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, meets Tony Blair in London today as violence in Iraq reaches a new crescendo and senior Iraqi officials say the break up of the country is…
Presidential hopeful John Edwards just released his plan for ending the Iraq war, making him the second of the major Democratic candidates to announce a proposed solution to our involvement in the conflict (Barack Obama sponsored a bill, S.433, last month that is in the Senate.) Looking at the two…
...and you'll be surprised who said that. Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki: "U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months [for withdrawal from Iraq]. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes."... "Whoever is thinking…

So what did you think dirty little colonial wars WERE about then? God, king and country?

The agreement between Mr. Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki confirms that the United States and Iraq will hash out an "enduring" relationship in military, economic and political terms.