The Smartest People in the Room

In February 2005, a bunch of smart people met to eat Chinese
food and talk about a new way to make money.  This included
Greg Lippman, a trader at Deutsche Bank; Rajiv Kamilla, a trader at
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. with a background in nuclear physics;
and Todd Kushman, who led a contingent from Bear
Stearns Cos.  There were about 50 people at the meeting.



What did they discuss?  The design of a new financial product:
securities based upon subprime mortgages.  As reported at href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601170&refer=special_report&sid=aA6YC1xKUoek"
rel="tag">Bloomberg
, they thought they
had figured something out...



The new standardized contracts they
created would allow
firms to protect themselves from the risks of subprime
mortgages, enable speculators to bet against the U.S. housing
market, and help meet demand from institutional investors for
the high yields of loans to homeowners with poor credit.



I suspect all those people are still pretty well off, even though they
may have brought about one of the biggest financial catastophes of all
time.  I guess that remains to be seen, but it is looking
pretty bad right now.



The tools also magnified losses so much
that a small number of defaulting subprime borrowers could devastate
securities held by banks and pension funds globally, freeze corporate
lending, and bring the world's credit markets to a standstill.



Does anyone still believe that a free-market economy is the way to go?



More like this

By way of ScienceBlogling Joseph, we learn of yet another way the collapse of the housing market will increase your state and local taxes (or require cuts in services). When investors stopped buying certain municipal bonds, the interest rates on the bonds skyrocketed--that is, it will cost cities…
Reading the news lately, I've come across an amazing example of how ubiquitous bad math can be used. Most of you have probably heard about what's been called "the sub-prime crisis". Despite a lot of media hand-wringing about how complicated it all is, the sub-prime crisis is really a very simple…
A friend cc:ed me on a letter to his Congressman, and I think he's basically right about the Wall Street bailout. He writes Congress: Please say NO. The Bush Administration's proposed bailout plan is overly broad, vastly too expensive, and lacks oversight and control that is absolutely necessary…
With Big Shitpile rolling on, there's been a lot of discussion about the ethics of defaulting on a home mortgage. Several people have commented on the hypocrisy of denigrating homeowners for doing the same thing that businesses do, without any moral qualms, so I won't say any more about that here…

Does anyone still believe that a free-market economy is the way to go?

I like the free market economy, but I think in cases where so much power is given to so few it has to be monitored and regulated. So, did I just blow the word free out of it? LOL!
Dave Briggs :~)

Lest we forget, the reason Osama chose to persue this strategy is because he was defeated domestically. He took them directly on and he got exiled. And for the past 5 years, this little, marginal, defeated guy is playing the most powerful nation in the world...

The tools also magnified losses so much that a small number of defaulting subprime borrowers could devastate securities held by banks and pension funds globally, freeze corporate lending, and bring the world's credit markets to a standstill.