Mandatory Voting

It's all over the Internet, so I won't belabor it.  People are
talking about the McCain video that allegedly implies that Obama might
be the Antichrist.  It's said to be a "dog-whistle," meaning
that only the intended audience gets the message.  Others
might see it, but miss the hidden meaning.  

From Crooked Timber:

of the World

by Henry on August 5, 2008

at his other place blogs about the latest McCain video (which is so
staggeringly bad at achieving its purported aims that it doesn't make
sense except as a dogwhistle video)...

...But the broader point is that Douthat (and David Brooks, and other
'nice' conservatives) are in denial. They've tied their fortunes to a
party whose electoral success partly depends on getting the xenophobic,
racist, homophobe and religious fanatic vote out. The McCain campaign
needs to get these people to the polling booths, while simultaneously
not alienating moderates too much, if it is to have any chance at all
of winning the election. And I don't think it's news to anyone that the
McCain people want to win the election. Hence, the optimal strategy is
dogwhistle messaging of exactly the kind we've been seeing.

This is why we should have mandatory voting.  Presidential
elections are so close, that the only real key to winning is to get
people so emotionally worked up, that they will put down their happy
meals and actually go out and vote.

The consequence: more negative campaigning, more incitement of hate,
and greater alienation of the centrist voters.  Everyone
complains about negative campaigning.  Even the candidates
complain about it.  But they do it, because it works.

I can't think of a way to prove it, a priori, but I
think that mandatory voting would make this kind of thing much less

And about the Antichrist thing: doesn't the Bible say something about
the Antichrist emerging from the sea?  


I guess that settles it.  No one has a picture of McCain
emerging from the sea.  


More like this

I always get in arguments with mathematically-inclined people about whether to vote or not. The mathematically-inclined point out very reasonably that the chances of your vote being decisive are perishingly slim. (These mathematics are explained clearly in this PBS video by economist Gordon…
I have no idea why so many smart people are saying that anything that happened over the last few days changes this election, or destroys the Republican Party. Pay attention, people. that is not what is happening. The Republican Party has become the party that harbors racism, sexism, misogyny,…
I recently heard a pollster remark, “When you give conservatives bad polling data, they want to kill you. When you give liberals bad polling data, they want to kill themselves.” That attitude has been well on display recently in the right-wing freak out over Nate Silver's website. Silver…
As hard as it is to believe, it's finally here. Election Day. After two years of painful, annoying, surprising, infuriating, and, on rare occasions, uplifting campaigning, it all comes down to this: Voters, alone in little booths, casting ballots that will decide which direction our nation goes for…

It makes sense: The corollary of mandatory free and compulsory education, in a Democracy, would be mandatory voting. But it'll never happen in this sick and sorry excuse we have for a representative government. People might as well petition Dick Cheney for redress due the conscientious objectors during Vietnam, who fled to Canada. The US is sunk, and has been for a long time. Look elsewhere for modern-day partisans of the Enlightenment.

Excuse me?? Isn't that Nobama's head superimposed on Jack Kennedy's body. I can't find the original pic, but I'm old enough to distinctly remember a JFK pic almost exactly like this.

And they said Bill C. was "slick".