More Economic Graphs

Wouldn't you know it?  Right after I post a compilation of
graphical representations of the href=",0,7686262.story">winter
of our  hardship, out come some more (HT: href="">DeLong,
The first shows the absolute number of job losses in this recession,
compared to all other post-WWII recessions.  It looks bad.


But, to put this in perspective, recall that the population keeps going
up.  Perhaps it is more meaningful to look at relative numbers, by
expressing the losses as a percentage of the workforce:


Or, viewed differently, in terms of year-over-year change:


Not quite as bad, when viewed in relative numbers, but still a serious
problem.  Keep in mind that the recovery from the 2001 recession
was never very robust.  As noted by the href="">New
York Fed in 2003:

The current recovery has seen steady growth in output but
no corresponding rise in employment. A look at layoff trends and
industry job gains and losses in 2001-03 suggests that structural
change--the permanent relocation of workers from some industries to
others--may help explain the stalled growth in jobs.

Chart 1

Payroll Job Growth during Recoveries

alt="Chart 1 - Payroll Job Growth during Recoveries" height="241"

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics;
authors' calculations.

Note: The shaded area indicates the length of the 2001 recession.

People went from manufacturing cars to manufacturing hamburgers. 
Therefore, the drop in employment, this time around, could have a
bigger impact.  The real economy was still wobbly when the current
recession hit.

Clearly, there are more humps ahead:


Obama said, in a major press conference last night, that we are in "the
winter of our hardship."  This is considerably more eloquent than href="">Hoover's
proclamation that "recovery is just around the corner." 
(Being more eloquent that Hoover is not difficult.)  It is even
more eloquent that href="">Carter's
"malaise" speech, which is a higher bar to clear. 

He dared to use the word "hardship."  This was counterbalanced, to
some extent, by his href="">statement:
"I am the eternal optimist."

He said the country could be in better shape by next year,
as measured by increased hiring, lending, home values and other
factors. "If we get things right, then, starting next year, we can
start seeing significant improvement."

I disagree with him on that point, unless he is referring to a
slowing in the rate of decline
as an improvement.


More like this

This chart shows what the stock market had been doing since the summer of 2007, when the effects of the economic crisis were openly recognized by the Administration.  You can see that that various interventions have resulted in brief improvements, but nothing sustained.  The overall trend clearly…
Ned Ryun, baby boy of the discredited and disreputable former Congressman Jim Ryun, wonders "do we really need 600,000 new govt. employees?": Appears that Obama is promising 600,000 new government employees. That is just slightly troubling. Ryun is currently employed at a conservative group that…
Every news media I looked at it is trumpeting good news - while unemployment increased in January, we're thrilled that it was only be 20,000 jobs. Because of this, the unemployment rate fell to 9.7% amid, as we learn on CNN "hope the economy will add jobs soon." What's buried in the middle of the…
Sociologist Jennifer Laird was researching unemployment among Mexican immigrants when she came upon some interesting numbers on black workers in the public sector and employment effects of the Great Recession. It piqued her interest and so she decided to keep digging. She found that while public…

I thought the best comment by Obama was "the party is over"
and I hope it is as far as people gorging on consumption of goods they don't need and can't afford.

what terrifies me is, i haven't been enjoying "the party", i've been saving, i've been working very shit jobs, if i've been lucky to get one with my !"%^ education, making sacrifices to save money so i can use it for future investments.

yet if the whole system goes 'tits up', not only have i missed "the party", i could be left to pay the bill of "the party".

By zombie_bot (not verified) on 10 Feb 2009 #permalink

I think Obama meant "the party [that was paid for with credit] is over [so now we've got to actually start producing something useful]."

maybe. but that threat is still there, ESPECIALLY with pensions and anything remotely linked to fund, which now days is everything from pensions to banks to governments.

By zombie_bot (not verified) on 11 Feb 2009 #permalink