The Thought Of It Being Organic Made Me Shudder

Michelle Obama's White House garden has href="">attracted some
attention, as noted on La Vida Locavore:

Did you hear the news?  The White House is planning to
have an "organic" garden on the grounds to provide fresh fruits and
vegetables for the Obama's and their guests.  While a garden
is a great idea, the thought of it being organic made Janet Braun,
CropLife Ambassador Coordinator and I shudder.
  As a result,
we sent a letter encouraging them to consider using crop protection
products and to recognize the importance of agriculture to the entire
U.S. economy. [emphasis added]

This was from an internal communication within the href="">Mid America CropLife Association. 
They sent a letter to Ms. Obama, expressing their concerns.  The
text of the letter is at La Vida Locavore.  It goes on at great
length about the benefits of what they call "conventional"

What they do not do, however, is show how any of that has anything to
do with the White House garden. 

First of all, it is her garden.  She can do what she wants. 
Criticizing it is akin to criticizing someone else's blog.  If you
don't like it, start your own.  Sure, us bloggers snipe at each
other every now and then, but it generally is done with the
understanding that people do what they want with their own space...

What is more important, though, is that their missive shows a
fundamental misunderstanding about food.  They imply that it
simple is not possible for people with individual gardens to make a
serious contribution to the food supply.  This is demonstrably
false.  Victory gardens supplied something like 40% of the
vegetables in the USA during World War II.  Granted, the
population is much higher, is on average less agriculturally literate,
and probably the average yard is smaller.  More people have no
yards at all.  But it is clear that people can grow a lot of food
if they want to.

They also claim that people don't have time to garden. 
Hmmm.  we have 8.5% headline unemployment.  Every week,
something like 20,000 people lose their jobs.  Long-term
unemployment is increasing.  A staggering number of persons are
not officially counted as unemployed, but are working part-time because
they can't find a full-time job.  Some think that the broad
measure of unemployment is approaching 20%. 

Plus, "conventional" farming is heavily dependent upon cheap oil. 
That may last for a while, but then again, it might not.

This brings to mind the debate that raged in the 1970's about the
future of computing.  Some insisted that the future was gong to be
with desktop computing.  Others insisted that the computing world
would be dominated by centralized servers.  Now, we see that both
play an important role.  Neither is going to fully displace the

The same argument plays out in other fields: centralized versus
distributed power generation, home video versus blockbuster
productions, state's rights versus federal domination, nuclear versus
extended families.  And so forth.  But the outcome always is
the same: it is not either-or; it is both-and. 

Should we shudder at the notion of an individual choosing to grow a
garden without pesticides?  No.  We should put efforts into
learning how to optimize the big ones AND the little ones.


More like this

Mrs. R. and I tend to favor organic produce, just on general principles. It's a bit more expensive but compared to eating out it's nothing and we aren't such volume consumers that we can't make it up by my buying one less book a month. And while Obama's many of Obama's cabinet picks have gotten…
Just an accounting of the last month of local food, sustainable agriculture, and science/food/safety articles is difficult to produce. Let alone a full understanding of them. One problem with studying the topic is that the proliferation of literature on sustainable ag and its associated elements…
The health care reform process is getting extremely ugly.  href=",0,6925890.story"> href=",0,6925890.…
One of the more enlightening and worrisome articles I read recently was href="">The Perils of Efficiency, by James Surowiecki.  The article was a discussion of the practical effects of the mathematical concept, that you…

I suspect that some may criticize the Obamas simply because they are afraid of, or intimidated by, people (regardless of their status as the First Family) who are highly intelligent, well-educated, self-motivated, active, and capable. These traits are sure to twist the knickers of people who are too lazy or who lack the motivation, intellectual horsepower, and discipline to start and maintain their own backyard garden (or any number of other productive and self-sufficient endeavors). Also, our grandparents and great-grandparents grew victory gardens and "used it up, wore it out, made do, or did without" during the Great Depression (and subsequent financial hard times), so there's no reason we can't learn to do the same. Unless, of course, we continue to dismiss elderly people, and their knowledge and experience, as worthless or backwards.

They imply that it simple is not possible for people with individual gardens to make a serious contribution to the food supply.

Ummm -- right. I'm still eating frozen produce I laid down two years ago (last year we had a pollination problem). Chiles, eggplant, and tomatillos mostly -- but that was only a couple of bushes. Maybe four square meters tops.

This year we're planting edible landscape plants. Ten okra bushes for shade and wind control, about seven beans for shade and flowers, lots more pepper and eggplant, quite a bit of squash and a few tomatoes (OK, I have a big back yard.) I have Indian co-workers asking me daily when the okra will be yielding. I don't think they understand how much an okra bush produces.

Give it away -- there are plenty of people on tight budgets.

They also claim that people don't have time to garden.

Spend about the equivalent of two days in March planting and it's pretty much go out in the morning and pick the stuff until November. Yeah, that's labor intensive.

Did I mention that we'd be planting something anyway for shade, flowers, and landscaping generally?

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 15 Apr 2009 #permalink

Also, it is not clear why the Obama's should be using chemicals for a private garden. The Obama's are not attempting to contribute to national agriculture; it's a PRIVATE GARDEN.

This doesn't mean they are advocating national use of organic crops, so that's a non-issue!

They are simply not growing food on a large, industrial scale that may significantly benefit from certain agrochemicals; there doesn't seem to be much point in going to the trouble of using chemicals in this, small-scale situation.

But you see, if people follow the Obamas' example and start their own gardens, they'd be less reliant upon the agricultural industry (more accurately, the corporations that are dependent upon one particular kind of agriculture).

They don't want people gardening because it'll cut into their profits. Never mind the fact that a hungry world demands optimal usage of space.

By punchfish (not verified) on 15 Apr 2009 #permalink

The main problem with this "La Vida Locavore" comment is not the content, but, rather, the grammar: "...made Janet Braun... and I [sic] shudder". This construction makes me shudder.

Yes. The main problem with this "La Vida Locavore" comment is not the content, but, rather, the grammar: "...made Janet Braun... and I [sic] shudder". This construction makes me shudder.