The USA still leads the world int he number of scientific papers
published per year. Germany and Japan were essentially tied
for second, for years. According to a recent report by
Thomspon-Reuters ISI, there is a new player at the table:
The report is
href="http://science.thomsonreuters.com/info/grr-china/">available
at Thomson Reuters, free registration required.
Note that this says nothing about quality; it is all about
quantity. (HT:
href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/11/china_leaps_to.html">Paul
Kedrosky) For a counterpoint, also see Kedrosky's
post on
href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/11/chinas_empty_ci.html">China's
empty city.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Via email, Mike Steeves points me to an Ars Technica article about a Thomson Reuters report on the "decline in American science":
The US is beginning to lose its scientific dominance. That's
the message from Thomson Reuters, the people behind EndNote and impact factors.
According to a report in…
It's time for the annual Mocking of the Thomson Reuters session.
They're at it again.
Can the winners of the Nobel Prize be correctly predicted? Since 1989, Thomson Reuters has developed a list of likely winners in medicine, chemistry, physics, and economics. Those chosen are named Thomson…
It's time for my annual post taking issue with Thomson Reuters (TR) Nobel Prize predictions.
(2002, 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2008, 2009, 2010)
Because, yes, they're at it again.
Can the winners of the Nobel Prize be correctly predicted? Since 1989, Thomson Reuters has developed a list of likely…
Last year on Counterpoint Anthony Watts appeared:
Michael Duffy: In which direction does the bias lie? Are you suggesting that the temperature has not got as hot as the American official historical record suggests?
Anthony Watts: That's correct. It's an interesting situation. The early arguments…
The big difference between the corporate- or capitalistic-leaning sects and those of the recently and somewhat jokingly dubbed âedupunkâ sect are in the underlying ideology of mashups, a do-it-yourself mentality, and above all affording learners and educators sufficient flexibility and opportunity to guide and discover their own learning paths. They thrive on open source technology, and the the notions of sharing and reuse.
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
The big difference between the corporate- or capitalistic-leaning sects and those of the recently and somewhat jokingly dubbed âedupunkâ sect are in the underlying ideology of mashups, a do-it-yourself mentality, and above all affording learners and educators sufficient flexibility and opportunity to guide and discover their own learning paths.