I am still trying to figure out what this means: "Available under the GPL Licence and in exclusivity for Mandriva Linux, Metisse differs from a classic 3D desktop ..."  Usually you don't see the terms "GPL" and "exclusivity" in the same sentence.  Anyway, Mandriva appears to be on the verge of some innovative ways of using the computer workspace. The story is here; the videos are more informative than the static images.  I haven't tried it, but anyone can try it by downloading and burning the live CD.   The folks at Mandriva may be on to something here.  They say it enforces work…
I am taking my time with the next big post, and happen to be on call, so I'm not getting enough sleep this week.  I know this is old, but it still amuses me.
This is the Rosette Nebula, as featured on Astronomy Picture of the Day.  Credit & Copyright: href="http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/Biography.html">Robert Gendler.  Click on the image for the full size version. It is in constellation Monoceros, which means Unicorn; just to the left of Orion.  According to Wikipedia, it is a "modern" constellation, having been named in 1613, or perhaps 1564.  I suppose in astronomical terms, 1613 really is modern.
It occurs to me that in order to go any farther explaining how to choose an antidepressant, I should take a moment to explain the concept of an adequate trial.  Earlier, I mentioned that the patient's history of response to previous antidepressant trials is one of the most important factors to consider.  Having said that, it is important to realize  that there are problems with that, both practical and theoretical. In order to derive valid conclusions from the outcome of any prior trial on an antidepressant, it is necessary to have the right information. Having the right information means…
Just so you will know what we'll be blowing to bits, if it comes to that.  These are more-or-less random photos from Flickr, tagged "Tehran." class="inset" alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/141/387979403_f9590c6c7f_m.jpg" border="0" height="169" width="240"> class="inset" alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/386617542_94e31bba03_m.jpg" border="0" height="180" width="240"> class="inset" alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/125/386617843_44c5edfa50_m.jpg" border="0" height="180" width="240"> class="inset" alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/185/…
(Part One is href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/02/basic_concepts_selection_of_an.php">here) Now we get to the heart of the matter: how does one decide what antidepressant to prescribe?  First, let's take a look at the factors that are considered relevant to the choice.  If you understand what factors are relevant, and why they are relevant, then you will start to see how the decision is made.  In the process of deciding which drug to prescribe, there are two bodies of information.  Well, actually there are more, but to keep things simple, I am going to artificially…
If this makes no sense to you, never mind.
Many ScienceBloggers, and some science bloggers, are writing posts about basic concepts.  I thought that was a good idea, but could not think of one that would be interesting and that I felt like writing about and that I was particularly well-suited to write. Psychiatry is not a basic science.  It is a medical practice that is derived from several basic sciences: psychology, pharmacology, physiology, anatomy, epidemiology, and so forth.  So this is not really a basic concept, in the sense of explaining something fundamental about nature.  Rather, it explains something that is fundamental in…
This is a nice little study that deserve a brief comment.  It's from Am J Psychiatry this month.  What is shows is that participation in psychotherapy can alter the rate of reported adverse effects from medication, and decrease the rate at which patients stop their medication because of adverse effects. Note that this study was done with patients with panic disorder.  It may not be generalizable to other patient populations. Usage note: I always use the term "adverse effects" rather than "side effects," because it is more precise.  Some side effects are good, some bad, some neutral.  So if…
This is a bizarre headline: href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2861168">Pentagon Says Pre-War Intel Not Illegal.  I found this item on Google News, and it is one of many headlines on the subject: href="http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/16656221.htm" id="r-1_1113380245">Pentagon office produced `alternative' intelligence on Iraq; href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7289295" id="r-6_1113380245">Pentagon: Pre-War Intelligence Was Legit; and others.  But some are more to the point: href="http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/…
I will chip in a few thoughts about the President's proposed budget, just to make a point.  Based upon the following from href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003254.html">DefenseTech.org, a pro-military site: ...That'll include "the first significant funding" -- $3 billion -- in the next generation of aircraft carrier," the CVN-21. The Joint Strike Fighter fleet will grow from two in FY07, to twelve the following year -- including the first short take-off version. It'll take $6 billion in 2008, the Pentagon projects. Despite major cost inflation, the Defense Department budget…
Post-game comments.  I understand the game was broadcast in 232 countries, and cybercast in six languages.  Maybe it is more than just another game, if it draws that much attention.  No, I take it back.  Money always attracts attention.  That is why everyone pays attention to the USA in the first place.  It is not "our freedom," or culture, or even our foreign policy.  It is just the money.
Part thirteen The commentators are talking a lot about how brilliant the winning coach is, even though the game is not quite over.  Are there any lessons to be drawn from this game?  No.  Super Bowl games usually are not very good, and this one was no exception.  It was exceptionally sloppy, and there were other unusual things about it, but in the end, it is just another game.  Except for those who made a ton of money.  Tomorrow, we get the treat of all the Monday-morning quarterbacking, plus the annual ritual of talking about the new advertisements that premiered during the game. 
It is looking as though the Colts are going to win this one.  Another interception, this time with the Bears on the losing end.  You just can't win if you keep throwing things away.  Over the past hour or so, I put plastic over two windows, because I was throwing away heat.  The winter here has been uncharacteristically warm up until now, so I didn't bother with the usual insulation ritual.  But now it is 18 below zero (C). There has been a lot of atypical weather this year in the USA.  Global warming?  Could be, but it is very difficult to ascribe any single event to any single cause. …
Part eleven.  Bears have the ball.  They were doing OK until their quarterback fell down.  Today has been proclaimed "Brian Urlacher Day," in New Mexico.  Governor Bill Richardson Declares Super Bowl Sunday "Brian Urlacher Day" in New Mexico February 2, 2007 Jon Goldstein 505-476-2248 (Santa Fe, NM) - Governor Bill Richardson today declared Super Bowl Sunday, this Sunday February 4, 2007, as "Brian Urlacher Day" in New Mexico in honor of the Chicago Bears middle linebacker, Lovington, New Mexico native and University of New Mexico football star... Politics is sometimes referred to as…
Part ten.  I don't think I can keep this up.  Football is sometimes referred to as "the thinking man's game."  More like the "sleeping man's game."  Many football players end up with large necks, because of the kinds of exercises they do.  A neck size greater than or equal to 46cm (18 inches) leads to an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnea, a common sleep disorder.  I think the Colts are going to win this one, but I might not be able to stay awake to see it.  Colts made another false start.  I've lost count of how many times they've done that.  Probably cost them a touchdown.  Oh,…
Part whatever.  It is hard to pay attention to detail with the TV on.  I'm making all kinds of mistakes doing this live-blogging thing.  It is not as easy as I thought it would be.  The game is only half-over and I have run out of ideas.  Nothing to say.  It's the old "nothing in, nothing out" syndrome.
Part eight.  Speaking of odds, do you remember who href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/julian/">Percy Julian was?  His work with steroids and alkaloids helped bring about a host of affordable and effective treatments for diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and glaucoma, benefiting millions worldwide. According to one of the ScienceBlogs sponsors, PBS, he "against all odds...became one of the greatest scientists of the 20th Century."  He was an African-American, born in Alabama, attended Harvard, but was not able to finish due to financial problems, possibly because of the lack of…
Part seven.  Merifully, it is almost half time.  We're at the two minute warning.  Colts offense is getting in gear.  Can't wait until half time.  I hear Prince will be performing.  He promised to not have any wardrobe malfunctions.  I hope he's right.  Cripes, another fumble.  And another.  I bet that's the first time in Superbowl history that there have been two pairs of back-to-back fumbles.  And the odds  of that?  Almost as good as the odds of success in Iraq.
Part six.  It is ironic, isn't it, that this game is being broadcast in High Definition, and it is raining, and the rain makes the picture indistinct.  I've been skeptical of the value of High Definition TV.  Seems like a waste of bandwidth.  Did it ever occur to anyone that bandwidth is a strategic asset?  It's like the supply of titanium (element 22).  Seems like with all the emphasis on national security these days, the last thing we should be doing is cluttering up our bandwidth with gigabits of hi-res football.  Not to mention all the head trauma.  And brain rot.  Don't forget about…