Krulwich on Darwin

One of the more unfortunate side-effects of the endless creationist controversy is that it dehumanizes Darwin: he either becomes a biological prophet - the Newton of life - or a Faustian devil, a thinker who sold his soul to discredit god. What gets lost is Darwin's astonishing scientific process, the stubborn way he solved the history of life by trying to make sense of its strange details. (Among creationists, it's also a truism that Darwin did no experiments, that the "theory" of natural selection was never empirically tested. Needless to say, they are magnificently wrong.) David Quammen's elegant little biography of Darwin draws on no new biographical sources, but it compensates with a portrait so poignant and personal that, after you finish the book, you feel as if you've spent a few hours chatting with Charles himself. For a wonderful interview with Quammen, check out Robert Krulwich's latest NPR piece. You'll learn what a floating asparagus has to do with natural selection, and how Francis Crick is tenuously connected to the theory of evolution.

Tags

More like this

199 years ago today, Charles Robert Darwin was born in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England at the home of his family (known as the Mount). By pure coincidence, Charles would have published one of the most important books ever written 50 years later in 1859, and next year will mark not only the…
It's bad enough to see basic scientific misinformation about evolution getting tossed around these days. USA Today apparently has no qualms about publishing an op-ed by a state senator from Utah (who wants to have students be taught about something called "divine design") claiming there is no…
If there is any phrase that is sure to raise the hackles of an evolutionary biologist, it is that evolution is "just a theory." This rallying cry of creationists plays off of the public misuse of the term "theory" to mean "Any wild guess that comes to mind which doesn't have substantial evidence to…
image by Mike Rosulek buy merchandise here to benefit NCSE It's a classic question: if Charles Darwin had known about Gregor Mendel's genetic research, would Darwin have realized it was the missing piece he needed to explain how individual variation was inherited and selected? Was it simply bad…

My son and I were listening to the interview this morning in the car on the way to his school and thoroughly enjoyed it. Do you think the publisher could be persuaded to send us a few copies to review?