Fractals and Literature

Jason Kottke, a consistent fount of great links, finds a revealing interview with David Foster Wallace about Infinite Jest. Here is DFW answering a question about whether or not his novel actually follows a fractal form*:

David Foster Wallace: That's one of the things, structurally, that's going on [in the novel]. It's actually structured like something called a Sierpinski Gasket, which is a very primitive kind of pyramidical fractal, although what was structured as a Sierpinski Gasket was the first- was the draft that I delivered to Michael in '94, and it went through some I think 'mercy cuts', so it's probably kind of a lopsided Sierpinski Gasket now. But it's interesting, that's one of the structural ways that it's supposed to kind of come together.

Michael Silverblatt: "Michael" is Michael Pietsche, the editor at Little, Brown. What is a Sierpinski Gasket?

DFW: It would be almost im- ... I would almost have to show you. It's kind of a design that a man named Sierpinski I believe developed -- it was quite a bit before the introduction of fractals and before any of the kind of technologies that fractals are a really useful metaphor for. But it looks basically like a pyramid on acid --

Here is a useful primer on the Sierpinski Gasket. And here is a picture of a gasket made out of coke cans.

i-53fa20c09c69c47c313af3fd3752875b-cokegasket.gif

*This interview makes me want to reread Infinite Jest, if only because I never even picked up the slightest trace of anything fractal in the work.

More like this

Most of the fractals that I've written about so far - including all of the L-system fractals - are examples of something called iterated function systems. Speaking informally, an iterated function system is one where you have a transformation function which you apply repeatedly. Most iterated…
I thought in addition to the graph theory (which I'm enjoying writing, but doesn't seem to be all that popular), I'd also try doing some writing about fractals. I know pretty much *nothing* about fractals, but I've wanted to learn about them for a while, and one of the advantages of having this…
One of the most fundamental properties of fractals that we've mostly avoided so far is the idea of dimension. I mentioned that one of the basic properties of fractals is that their Hausdorff dimension is larger than their simple topological dimension. But so far, I haven't explained how to figure…
In the post about Koch curves, I talked about how a grammar-rewrite system could be used to describe fractals. There's a bit more to the grammar idea that I originally suggested. There's something called an L-system (short for Lindenmayer system, after Aristid Lindenmayer, who invented it for…

Oh I think Infinite Jest would be right up your alley. One theory about the fractal structure of the novel has to do with the pieces of "missing" time and how they correspond with the blank spaces in the gasket. The largest (center) hole in the gasket would be represented by the largest chunk of missing time (the Year of Glad) and the smaller blank triangles would be represented by the missing days (the novel only recounts what occurs every other day in November YDAU). However, Wallace said that the Gasket is sort of lopsided and I believe this refers to the fact that only two larger holes (representing Hal/ETA and Gately/Ennet) survive where there would've been three for another storyline (cf. Steven Moore's essay here: http://www.thehowlingfantods.com/ij_first.htm).

By mattbucher (not verified) on 11 Dec 2007 #permalink

Here and I thought Aristotle's incline was a good way to frame a novel...

By amybuilds (not verified) on 12 Dec 2007 #permalink