Math and the Brain

Jim Holt has a great article on the strange neural anatomy of mathematics in the new New Yorker:

One morning in September, 1989, a forme sales representative in his mid-fortie entered an examination room with Stanisla Dehaene, a young neuroscientist based in Paris Three years earlier, the man, whom researcher came to refer to as Mr. N, had sustained a brai hemorrhage that left him with an enormous lesion in the rear half of his lef hemisphere. He suffered from severe handicaps: his right arm was in a sling; h couldn't read; and his speech was painfully slow. He had once been married, wit two daughters, but was now incapable of leading an independent life and live with his elderly parents. Dehaene had been invited to see him because hi impairments included severe acalculia, a general term for any one of severa deficits in number processing. When asked to add 2 and 2, he answered "three. He could still count and recite a sequence like 2, 4, 6, 8, but he was incapable o counting downward from 9, differentiating odd and even numbers, or recognizin the numeral 5 when it was flashed in front of him.

Read the whole thing. Math, like reading, is a fascinating example of an innate cognitive talent that has been utterly transformed by culture. We've taken this crude ability to count and turned it into calculus. The problem is that, even as the human species has learned to deal with increasingly complex kinds of numbers, we are trapped inside a brain that's the messy product of evolution. The Pleistocene era didn't have algebra. (As Gary Marcus puts it, we are kluge.) This means that even the most abstract of equations are intertwined with seemingly irrelevant psychological variables:

A few years ago, while analyzing an experiment on number comparisons, Dehaene noticed that subjects performed better with large numbers if they held the response key in their right hand but did better with small numbers if they held the response key in their left hand. Strangely, if the subjects were made to cross their hands, the effect was reversed. The actual hand used to make the response was, it seemed, irrelevant; it was space itself that the subjects unconsciously associated with larger or smaller numbers. Dehaene hypothesizes that the neural circuitry for number and the circuitry for location overlap. He even suspects that this may be why travellers get disoriented entering Terminal 2 of Paris's Charles de Gaulle Airport, where small-numbered gates are on the right and large-numbered gates are on the left. "It's become a whole industry now to see how we associate number to space and space to number," Dehaene said. "And we're finding the association goes very, very deep in the brain."

More like this

We've had plenty of discussion of the Stroop Effect on Cognitive Daily, and a cool effect it is -- but it's not the only effect with a catchy name. How about the spatial numerical association of response codes effect? Not catchy enough for you? The scholars researching the effect have taken to…
Over at Mind Matters, the expert blog I curate at Scientific American, we've had some really good posts lately. The most recent post, by Maryanne Wolf (author of that other Proust book on neuroscience, Proust and the Squid), Mirit Barzillai and Elizabeth Norton, looks at the reading brain. They…
IN the 1860s, the French physician Paul Broca treated two patients who had lost the ability to speak after suffering strokes. When they died, he examined their brains, and noticed that both had damage to the same region of the left frontal lobe. About a decade later, neuropsychiatrist Carl Wernicke…
When I was addressing this lunacy about how God exists because minds and mathematics are supernatural, I was also thinking about a related set of questions: biologically, how are numbers represented in the brain? How did this ability evolve? I knew there was some interesting work by Ramachandran on…

I would want to see if those who were raised reading a right-to-left language had the same results in regards to small and large numbers being better handled with the answer key in left or right hands. Also, most students at some point were taught a number line with larger numbers pointing right.

I remember a similar situation in singing: all western musicians regard higher pitches as physically higher because they are written higher on the staff. Singers must be consciously broken of this habit or they will physically reach for high notes.

When I read the article, I kept hoping that it would get to the process of teaching math. It did not, which was disappointing. The question of how to teach math is really something that I've been exploring for a couple of years. Recently, my wife, Jamie Lee has been using the Natural Human Learning Process (NHLP) for teaching writing to college students. The process uses "individual, small group, large group" over and over as more material is added for the students to learn. It's been very effective for writing - but we haven't found anybody who is using this process for teaching math. If anybody has a pedagogy for math that actually works, we would love to hear about it.
Thanks,
Milt Lee - milt at manykites dot org