Pitchers and Hitters

The Times has an interesting profile of Johan Santana, perhaps the most effective pitcher in baseball. What's interesting about Santana is that his secret isn't a 98 mph fastball or some wicked new breaking ball. Rather, he strikes out batters because he denies batters the perceptual cues they rely on when making batting decisions:

Whether Santana fires a fastball that zooms in at 90 to 94 miles an hour or flips a changeup that lumbers in at 77 to 80, he does everything exactly the same. He uses the same delivery, the same release point and the same exertion. Then he does it again and again. That repetitiveness helps camouflage which of the drastically different pitches he is throwing.

"You make them guess," Santana said. "That's the whole point. You want to keep them off balance."

When Santana tosses the changeup, his thumb is on the right side of the ball and is the only finger that does not touch a seam. Santana's index finger is across the inside seams, his middle and ring fingers are along the top seams (with the knuckles touching the seams) and his pinkie is on the seams along the left side of the ball (with the knuckle also touching the seams). Santana uses a similar grip for his four-seam fastball.

By using the same type of grip and throwing his fastball and changeup from the same release point, the pitches leave his hand resembling twins.

Baseball fans pay so much attention to the sheer velocity of a fastball - the stat appears on the television screen after every pitch - but the kind of subterfuge used by Santana is even more important. To understand why, it helps to know a little bit about the psychological mechanics of hitting. The numbers make the task look impossible. A typical major league pitch takes about 0.35 seconds to travel from the hand of the pitcher to home plate. (This is about the amount of time in between human heartbeats.) Unfortunately for batters, it takes about 0.25 seconds for their muscles to initiate a swing, leaving their brain a paltry one-tenth of a second to make up its mind. But even this estimate is too generous. Because it takes a few milliseconds for the visual information to travel from the retina to the visual cortex, the batter really has less than five milliseconds to perceive the pitch and decide whether or not to swing. But we can't think this quickly: even under perfect conditions it takes the brain about twenty milliseconds to respond to a sensory stimulus.

So how do major league baseball players manage to hit a fastball? The answer is that the brain begins collecting information about the pitch long before the pitch leaves the hand. As soon as the pitcher begins his windup, the batter will automatically start to pick up on "anticipatory clues" that help him winnow down the list of possibilities. A torqued wrist suggests a curveball, while an elbow fixed in a right angle means that a fastball is coming, straight over the plate. (Santana is effective precisely because he denies batters these subconscious clues.) The batters, of course, aren't consciously studying these signs: they can't tell you why they decided to swing at a certain pitch. And yet, they are able to act based upon this information. A study of expert cricket batters, for instance, demonstrated that the players could accurately predict the speed and location of the ball based solely on a one second video of the pitcher's windup. In other words, the best way to make your fastball more effective is to make sure it looks like an off-speed pitch. Don't give batters the information they depend on when standing at the plate.

If you'd like to learn more about the neuroscience of baseball, I'd recommend Your Brain on Cubs.

More like this

You could write a book about baseball and neuro science - and I think you should. Especially if you have tips on helping my 8th grade player make his high school team.

Did you really say "cricket batters"? The view from England ... yes, you are right, batters have least success not just against the fastest balls, but those that are the most disguised. The "slower ball" is a well known weapon in the armoury, as are offspin, legspin, swing, reverse swing, seam movement, etc. But please, they are "bowlers" not "pitchers" :)

In short, Santana has no tells. Never play cards with this guy.

I'm usually just a lurker, but a post about baseball makes me speak up :) I recommend a book called The Psychology Of Baseball, by Mike Stadler. I read it a few months ago and it's fantastic.

As always, great post.
One thing though:
---"Baseball fans pay so much attention to the sheer velocity of a fastball"---
Well, the smart ones don't. One of the greatest pitchers to play the game is Greg Maddux---the only man ever to win at least 15 games for 17 straight years---and Maddux has operated basically with a mid-80s fastball and a change-up. Precision and speed-variation are the keys to pitching. Sheer, blazing speed, when exclusively applied, only ensures that the ball will leave the ballpark faster.

Some time can be saved by not waiting for the output from V1 - the "earliest" part of the cortex to receive visual info. In fact, visual information bypassing V1 but via the superior colliculus can register in the parietal lobe before it registers in V1. It's faster moving stimuli that achieve this, and we are able to respond to them before we are conscious of them, particularly with training. This is the sort of thing that lies behind blindsight - use of the basic vertebrate machinery to respond appropriately to stimuli we haven't got the right brain bits for, but subconsciously.

On cricket "batters": batsmen rather than batters. And as "How to Bluff at Cricket" tells us, nowadays, "batsman" embraces "batswoman". (But, it adds, never in front of the sightscreen.)

By Stra nge tru ther (not verified) on 18 Mar 2008 #permalink