Frequent Flyer Miles of Publishing?

514px-George_Clooney_66ème_Festival_de_Venise_(Mostra)_3Alt1.jpg
Photo by Nicolas Genin.

66ème Festival de Venise (Mostra)

In the touching film "Up in the Air," Ryan Bingham played by George Clooney has an ambition of earning ten million frequent flyer miles, for which he:

receives an instant upgrade: a personally engraved metal card that will allow him to directly access his own private operator, someone who will greet him by name.

No such thing exists for publishing - whether you're a writer, a reviewer or an editor - until now.

Mike Fowler of the Nature Network describes a new "publishing revolution" in his recent blog post. The current system for publishing creative works, especially for scientists, is time consuming with the sole reward of enhancing one's academic standing. Like Mike Fowler, I have reviewed hundreds of manuscripts for a wide range of journals and serve on Editorial Boards on a voluntary basis. On top of that, most journals that accept my work for publication require "page charges," sometimes well in excess of $1,000.

There is a better way.

Peerage of Science is a new initiative that aims to improve on some of the perceived problems with peer review, independently from journals and publishing houses. They aim to have scientists organise themselves into a community that submits articles, selects which they would like to review, and gain rewards for carrying out the sort of work they already do for free for the journals, by accruing credits by reviewing, that are then used to 'pay' for manuscript submission. Reviewers are also given the opportunity to publish the critiques they write of their peers' work.

Peerage of Science was founded by researchers at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland.

I wish this new venture success, because the traditional system of academic publishing has become outdated and cumbersome.

More like this

I've frequently noted that one of the things most detested by quacks and promoters of pseudoscience is peer review. Creationists hate peer review. HIV/AIDS denialists hate it. Anti-vaccine cranks like those at Age of Autism hate it. Indeed, as blog bud Mark Hoofnagle Mark Hoofnagle, pointed out…
Over at the Nature blogs, they're soliciting comments and opinions about open peer review: The goal of any change in the peer review system must be to improve the quality of review, where quality is determined by two distinct functions: filtering manuscripts for publication in a given journal; and…
Having spent the last couple of days dealing with pure woo, such as germ theory denialism and naturopathic quackery, I think now's as good a time as any to move on to a more serious topic. One of the most important aspects of science is the publication of scientific results in peer-reviewed…
Rethinking Peer Review: In reality, peer review is a fairly recent innovation, not widespread until the middle of the twentieth century. In the nineteenth century, many science journals were commandingly led by what Ohio State University science historian John C. Burnham dubbed "crusading and…