"At-home" burglaries

The percentage of at-home burglaries is
higher in the US (14%) than it is in Canada (10%). If guns account
for the difference it is because US burglars are more likely to be
armed and feel that they can take on the residents.

US data comes from the National Crime Survey 1979-87. In 14.7% of
residential burglaries there was someone at home at the time. (Cited
in "Crime and Justice: A Review of Research" v14 p56) The Canadian
figure is for Edmonton in 1987 from "Canadian Urban Victimization
Survey #9". OK, the numbers are not strictly comparable, since one is
for an Canadian urban area, while the other is the whole US. It is
possible that the rate for Canada as a whole is higher than the US, if
the rate for Canadian rural areas is much higher than for urban areas,
but rural areas have higher levels of gun ownership, so either way we
have more at-home burglaries where there are more guns.

Tags

More like this

On pages 136-138 of "Point Blank" Kleck discusses Kennesaw burglaries. He states that after Kennesaw passed a (purely symbolic) law requiring a gun in every household, residential burglaries fell by 89%. His explanation for this decrease is that publicity about the law reminded
In an opinion piece in the New York Times Glenn Reynolds claims:
Frank Crary said: [Kennesaw] was a response to Morton Grove's gun ban. Guess which "worked" better? If by "worked" you mean that crime rates were lower after the relevant law than before, the answer is Morton Grove.