Effects of Washington DC gun ban

pim writes:

Are you arguing that the increase in D.C.'s suicide and homicide rates is
related to a law passed 12 years earlier ?

Thomas Grant Edwards said:

I don't see why this is difficult to imagine. It might have taken 12 years
for most of the legal grandfathered guns in the hands of average citizens
to filter into the hands of criminals, seeing as how it is impossible
for a D.C. resident to legally sell his gun.

  1. Is it? Why can't they sell it outside DC?

  2. Are you saying that it takes 12 years to illegally sell a gun?? If
    you are saying that this supposed transfer happened gradually over 12
    years then surely your theory predicts a gradual increase over 12
    years, rather than a decrease for ten years and then a sharp increase
    (which is what actually occured).

  3. The sharp increase also occured in the suburbs of Washington
    outside DC. Did the DC law cause this too?

I will add that I think the Drug War is the main cause of high crime in D.C.
But the gun ban removed an important crime deterrent.

Perhaps it did, but there is no evidence to support this claim.

More like this

Matthew Yglesias and Mark Kleiman have both written about the Assault Weapons Ban. I agree with Yglesias that the ban doesn't make sense since it bans weapons by name rather than by some characteristic that makes them dangerous. I've criticized the ban in Australia on semi-automatic…
Canada. Gun law in 78. Homicide rate (per 100,000 population) 74-78 2.7 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.8 average 2.9 79-83 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 average 2.6 (a t test on the statistical significance of the difference of the means gives p=.01) Thomas Grant Edwards said: From "Gun Control and Rates of Firearm…
A Harvard School of Public Health Press Release describes a new study by Miller, Hemenway and Azreal: In the first nationally representative study to examine the relationship between survey measures of household firearm ownership and state level rates of homicide, researchers at the Harvard Injury…
I was curious to see what kind of defense Matt would put on against my suggestion of additional regulations to address the problem of gun violence and homicide in the US, and I was a bit disappointed to see that the response is largely a "no problem" argument. I had actually come into this debate…