James Q Wilson on DGUs

Ray writes:

Danny's obvious reading disability has not allowed him to
read this when I posted it before. Maybe he can get a friend to
read it to him this time:

W A Collier writes:

Ray, one question for you: If all these other folks including Marvin E.
Wolfgang (widely acclaimed as a statistician) found no fault serious
enough to invalidate the methodology of Kleck, then how do you account
for your posting? Are you a better analyst than Wolfgang and Kleck/Gertz
- or are you simply making up a some of this, cutting bits and pieces
from their contexts, and then changing contexts (as I have seen you do
repeatedly - a bad flaw) to make it look as if it is damning enough to
discredit Kleck? After all, Wolfgang himself wrote: "What troubles me is
the article by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. The reason I am troubled is
that they have provided an almost clear-cut case of methodologically
sound research .."

Seems pretty clear to me an acclaimed and admittedly anti-gun researcher
found no flaws significant enough to discredit the work by Kleck - so
where does your opinion and expertise come from (compared to a PhD and
life long awarded fellow like Wolfgang)?

Here's what James Q. Wilson has to say:
(from The New Republic, August 25, 1997 v217 n8 p38(4))

Using the data compiled by the National Crime Victimization Survey
(NCVS) of 56,000 families, scholars have estimated that there are, at
a minimum, between 65,000 and 80,000 defensive gun uses per year. Some
estimates based on private polls suggest much higher defensive uses,
ranging up to 1.5 or even 2.5 million. The data supplied by private
polls are controversial, since so much depends on inferring
society-wide effects from the answers of a tiny number of
respondents. (If, to take a recent study, only 54 people out of 2,500
surveyed said they used a gun to defend themselves, then each of the
54 represents 68,000 Americans. Reporting errors--lies, exaggerations,
poor memory--on the part of just a few people can have huge effects on
the total number of defensive gun uses.) So consider instead the much
larger and more reliable NCVS, conducted by the Census Bureau,
according to which defensive gun uses in America are not trivial:
65,000 to 80,000 uses each year.

Tags

More like this

"Eugene Volokh" writes: I should say that I agree with some of your criticisms of the Kleck & Gertz results, and of the 1.5 million count arrived at by the NSPOF study; In case anyone remains who finds the Kleck estimate credible, let me make a couple more observations: On page 170 Kleck "…
Peter Boucher writes: Just in case anyone's interested. Copied from Kleck/Gertz, here are the polls from table 1 (minus those with no estimate of annual DGUs): Survey, Where, What year, What kinds of guns, # DGUs Field, California, 1976, just handguns, 3.1M Bordua, Illinois, 1977, all guns, 1.4M…
Note that even if you are in love with Kleck's estimate for DGUs, you can't honestly compare it with the NCVS estimate for gun crimes, since it is not possible for both Kleck's estimate for DGUs and the NCVS estimate for gun crimes to be correct. Dr. Paul H. Blackman writes: Why not? NCVS's…
Dr. Paul H. Blackman writes: Just a very few comments: Folks can report an incident to the police without reporting gun use. I once fetched a gun to encourage some burglars to leave, and reported the burglary but not the gun use, since the gun possession was unlawful. The Kleck estimate is not…