Duncan on ethics

Otis Dudley Duncan makes an important point: whether or not Lott actually did some sort of survey, Lott is guilty of scientific misconduct. Duncan has uncovered the case of a Dr Duan, who was suspended for two years for publishing a study for which the supporting data had been lost.

Tags

More like this

Otis Dudley Duncan and Tim Lambert The discussions on so many blogs on the Lott case have been invaluable not only in turning up new evidence but also in illustrating the wide variety of reactions to the evidence. One thing that strikes a professional researcher is that many who have commented do…
Otis Dudley Duncan has sent me these comments, which draw attention to a key point that almost all bloggers have missed:"There are two distinct issues in this case. Lott repeatedly made erroneous statements about the findings of other researchers. None of the national surveys that he cited by…
After discussion has simmered along via email, Usenet and mailing list, Marie Gryphon has posted a nice summary on her blog. Several blogs have picked up on this: Julian Sanchez, Jim Henley, Jane Galt, Kevin Drum and Thomas M. Spencer. Clayton Cramer has posted a letter from John Lott on his…
[On Sep 14 2002 I posted this to firearmsregprof. I also emailed it to John Lott. ] Way back in 1993 in talk.politics.guns, C. D. Tavares wrote: The answer is that the gun never needs to be fired in 98% of the instances of a successful self-defense with a gun. The criminals just leave abruptly…