Precondition failed

A couple of readers have gotten an error message like this when they try to access my blog:

Precondition Failed

We're sorry, but we could not fulfill your request for / on this server.

We have established rules for access to this server, and any person or robot that violates these rules will be unable to access this site.

And then it goes on to list some suggestions on how to fix things. You can blame spammers if you get this message because it comes from an anti-spam plugin Bad Behavior. Spambots usually don't follow the correct protocols when accessing a website, because it is less work for them that way. BB stops spambots by blocking access to this site by software that does not behave correctly. It also temporarily block all access from the same IP address. It even blocked me the other day.

However the paranoids at Climate Audit concluded that when BB blocked John A that I had deliberately blocked his access because I was somehow afraid of him. This is, by itself, ludicrous. After making this howler about entropy, John A fled from any discussion about his error to the safety of Climate Audit where McIntyre covers for his mistake by deleting any mention of it. Anyway, after I explained how BB had blocked him, John A responded not with a correction and an apology but with this:

I note that Lambert has continued lying and blaming me. Yes, just straight lies. I wasn't blocked by a "spambot", or anything like it, because a spambot doesn't block by setting rules at the level of the Web server itself. Those rules must have been deliberately set by someone not a million miles from Lambert's office.

This is clearly wrong since the message cam from Bad Bahavior and not the web server. When I showed them this they just came up with a new bogus theory (I had blocked him using robots.txt) of how I had deliberately blocked John A. Eventually they came up with an unfalsifiable theory, though Steve McIntyre generously allowed that it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Incidentally, Climate Audit runs Bad Behavior as well, so if you get the precondition failed message or some other such message from their blog I guess you can conclude that they blocked you on purpose.

Update: In comments, the author of Bad Behavior points out that Climate Audit is running a rather old version of Bad Behavior. That means that at the time they were accusing me of lying because the "Precondition Failed" message couldn't have come from a plugin, they were actually running the very plugin that issued the message. Of course they have never mentioned that they were using Bad Behavior themselves.


More like this

In the discussion onthis post, per posted an abusive comment, violating my comment policy. I've had to ban him twice before (see here andhere), so I simply banned him again, deleting the offending comment and the few that he posted after that. That should have been the end of it, but the folks at…
NASA's GISS has on-line graphing system that lets you see a graph of temperatures for a particular weather station (For example, here is Sydney airport).) Steve McIntyre decided to run a script that asked the GISS system to produce graphs of each and every station in the data set (thousands of…
Last year Steve McIntyre insinuated that Gavin Schmidt was dishonest after one of McIntyre's comments was held up in moderation: (link in quote is mine) Posting at realclimate is a little thing. I was once involved in trying to detect a business fraud many years ago. A friend told me that to look…
Over at ClimateAudit Steve McIntyre complains that Al Gore loving Google has dropped ClimateAudit from their search results: I've noted from time to time that ranked extremely high on many google searches. One of the ways to find articles here has been to simply use google. I often…

Oh, what fun! This is definitely the most interesting drama related to the use of Bad Behavior I've ever seen. Keep me up to date.

I also note that Climate Audit seems to be running a quite old version. :)