One of the less pleasant parts of my job is talking to students that I have caught plagiarizing assignments. All too often, rather than admit to copying they will tell me clumsy lies and blame somebody else.
Like Mark Steyn. When he was caught stealing from a blog post by Geoff Pullum, instead of apologizing and giving Pullum appropriate credit, he implausibly claimed that he had independently came up with the same examples and wording.
From John Quiggin and PZ Myers, who got it from Bitch, Phd, who got it from Unfogged.
My previous posts on Steyn are here.
Update: See John Holbo on Steyn's "premature dejoculation".
More update: Predictably, Tim Blair denies everything.
More like this
I'm not going to talk about Mark Steyn, other than to say that if you know who Rush Limbaugh is, Mark Steyn is a bit to the right and a tad more obnoxious, but not as smart.
You can find out more by clicking here, using the Climate Change Science Search Engine.
I'm also not going to say much…
When I came up for my reappointment review three years into my professorial career, I was given a list of required materials to submit, which included a "statement of teaching philosophy." The same thing had been required for my job application, and at that time, I wrote about techniques and…
This afternoon in Washington DC, Texas Republican Ted Cruz, who does not believe in global warming yet is chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness, will convene a hearing called “Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate over the Magnitude of Human Impact…
I think its pretty obvious to even the most casual observer of this blog, I am not a professional writer. I am a scientist-in-training who is madly in love with viruses, and wants the general public to understand how cool viruses are too, so I write this blag.
While I have been coaxed into writing…
Ooops.
Hope not to be see my blog accused of the same failures.
THE REAL CO2 DEBATE comment is basically a summary of info collected, and a rehash of what has been much said and by many. The consolation I guess, is that any statistical error can be attributed to misinformation heard or read, and collected from others. I can only take credit for the presentation, and have no one source (or collection) of sources I could credit, since even the figures stated are little more than media soundbites or news 'headliners'
Then again I am not presenting the short comment as a 'paper' nor do I make any claim to 'originallity'. Does that leave me 'free' or clear of any liability?
I've seen Steyn borrow witticisms before. Tim Blair linked to a post of Currency Lad's where, referring to Andrew Jaspan's comments on Douglas Wood, he said something like "This must be the first recorded case of Stockholm Syndrome by proxy". Mark Steyn's version, published a week or so later, was something like "This must be a first: Douglas Wood didn't get Stockholm Syndrome, but everyone back home did".
Could be coincidence, but since I'm sure Steyn reads Tim Blair, I'm somewhat doubtful.
I have to say I am profoundly unshocked. Isn't this what hacks do? To clear up the point I went to Wikipedia to find out where the term "hack" comes from:
So Steyn is a hack? What else is new?