Im kvelling!

I told you earlier about Proposal 2, a proposed constitutional amendment here in Michigan. The lies being spread about this proposal are thick and vicious. Orac also goes into a bit of detail about the dishonest tactics being used, mostly by religious groups, to try and stop this prop.

Just to remind you, Prop 2 would prevent the state and local governments in Michigan from passing laws against human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research that are any more restrictive than federal law. That's about it. The law does not set up any government agencies, taxes, fees or mandates. It only keeps Michigan safe from theocratic laws that inhibit research funded by non-governmental agencies. hESC research is a growing and important field, which has the potential to give significant insights into human disease, and perhaps some day, treatments as well. hESC's are different from other stem cells used in laboratories. They are derived as a byproduct of infertility treatment. When harvesting eggs from a woman, there are inevitably more embryos produced than can be safely implanted in the patient, and unused embryos (each of which is a microscopic blob of cells) are usually discarded. If the parents wish, they can donate these cell clusters to science.

These are not fetuses. This is not abortion. The cell clusters have no arms and legs, no faces, nothing to identify them as anything that could grow into an animal. Any arguments that equate stem cell research with abortion are patently false.

Now some religious folks have moral objections to stem cell research, mostly those who believe that "life" begins at conception. It is unlikely that any of these people will support Prop 2, and they have an honest, albeit misguided reason for doing so.

What really gets my goat is the campaign of lies that is hiding this religious motive. Commercials are saying that Prop 2 will require government spending, will encourage selling of human parts, and all manner of weird accusations (including the man-cow hybrid thinggie).

So my wife, who is a very busy person, took some time out of a very busy day to get the word out. She went to someone's house to pick up Prop 2 literature, read it, asked questions, and went door-to-door in our neighborhood to spread the word.

She has a lot of reasons for wanting to do this, not the least of which is our nephew, a type I diabetic since the age of four, who may stand to benefit in the future from hESC research. She rightly thinks that he is more important than the "dignity" of a few cells in a dish.

My wife, who is an educator by profession, but not a scientist, did her reading, learned what she needed to, and put together a non-partisan message to bring to our neighbors. It took a lot of chutzpah, and I'm just so darn proud of her.

More like this

In a little over a week, Michigan voters will be asked to vote on Proposal 2. The proposal is very simple. It is a constitutional amendment that makes Michigan a less hostile place for human embryonic stem cell (HESC) research. It forbids state or local government from passing laws that are more…
Two years ago, there was a brouhaha in Missouri over a ballot proposal to allow state funding for embryonic stem cell research using discarded embryos from fertility clinics. The issue made national news, including some rather despicable rhetoric from Rush Limbaugh about Michael J. Fox, who made…
Or rather, why can't they just be honest about what they don't like? This is the summary of a new ad running against the Missouri stem cell research amendment: The ad features a woman talking about her daughter, who needed money for college. She “sold her eggs to a fertility clinic,” the woman says…
When the NIH released its draft guidelines on human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research in late April, they were open to a 30-day period of public comment before the formulation of the final rules. Today, the NIH has released its final guidelines (pdf). Not much has changed, so there's not really…

That is awesome and exactly the kind of serious activism we need nowadays to fight for science! YAY, Mrs. PalMD!!!

The religious right's obsession with the man-cow hybrid thing is... extremely weird.

So, and I say this with the utmost respect so please don't take it the wrong way:

Your wife is a mensch. Eshet chayil. Please tell her so.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 29 Oct 2008 #permalink

As a Michigan resident, I am nearly certain that this measure will fail. The commercials and signs "2FarOn2" are ubiquitous--linking the issue to abortion and taxes. All of this is being paid for by a Michigan Catholic organization and "Right To Life Michigan".

That's right: the fundies.

I'm afraid the tactic has been incredibly effective. Every McCain/Palin sign is flanked to an adjacent "2FarOn2" sign. I've even seen a few Obama signs with the "2FarOn2" signs next to them.

I mean, the ads show an freaking infant (in a drop) being mixed with a cow, for goddamnsakes.

Though the activism indicated is very, very heartwarming, I'm very pessimistic about the prospects of both measures being passed (Proposal 1 (Medial Marijuana) and Proposal 2).

Thanks so much for your effort, Ms.Pal! While we don't have anything as truely horrifying as Prop2 to vote against,we do still have Palin & Co. Being that I live nearly in the shadow of Wall Street, most of the bizarre propaganda I hear concerns money(natch)... the other day, a Hannity-listener I know did the whole redistribution rag.I refer people to TaxCutFacts.org, where you can calculate your tax cut based on earnings.Funny how so many of the middle class fancy themselves being the hypothetical *providers* rather than the *recipients* of US wealth!

By Denice Walter (not verified) on 30 Oct 2008 #permalink

Since I am the mother of the nephew of the wife of the Doctor, I am most definitely in favor of and am voting YES on proposal 2! Thanks for writing this blog and exposing people to the truth and reality of this proposal. I along with the rest of my family hope that someday there will be a cure for Type I Diabetes which will probably result in a tremendous amount of stem cell research!

Correct me if I am wrong, but is it not a violation of the Separation of Church and State amendmendment when a church uses its power to influence an election?

By The Blind Watchmaker (not verified) on 01 Nov 2008 #permalink