Timothy Sandefur has taken note of the posts on Bork by myself and Jon Rowe and added his own voice to the discussion (if there is anything that bonds the three of us together, it's our shared distaste for Robert Bork). I like this passage a lot:
The cure, you see, for the misery of homosexuals in a society which condemns homosexuality, is to ratchet up the persecution. This is the logic of Torquemada, for Christsake! How can this man be taken seriously? And yet he is not only taken seriously; he is the intellectual leader of today's conservatives. He is alluded to by the President of the United States in the presidential debates. He is fêted and admired and quoted and cited respectably by members of the Federalist Society (of which he is one of two leaders). He is at the forefront.
And he is right. Despite the obvious lunacy of his views, Bork is the single most influential legal scholar among conservatives. To those of us who have actually read his legal writings, that fact would be mind-boggling except for one consideration - Bork gives intellectual cover and apparent justification to their desire to control other people. He is therefore convenient for them.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Timothy Sandefur has posted an excellent essay on libertarian judicial philosophy, as part of an ongoing debate going on between myself, Sandefur, Jonathan Rowe, Randy Barnett and Larry Solum (on the libertarian side) and Clayton Cramer, Stephen Bainbridge and Owen Courreges (on the conservative…
Jon Rowe predicts that Bush will have as many as 3 appointments to the Supreme Court in his second term, and most court-watchers would agree. One seems a bare minimum, two seems quite likely and three is very possible. Much of the focus has been on Chief Justice Rehnquist lately, given his ongoing…
Jon Rowe is guest blogging at Sandefur's place this week, which is great because I only have to go to one place to find both of their posts for a while. Already, Jon has a great post up about Harry Jaffa and his views of homosexuality, and Timothy has a follow-up to it extending one of the…
Jon Rowe has an interesting post up about an article by Thomas DiLorenzo. DiLorenzo's article was about a book called Intellectual Morons, by Daniel Flynn. Flynn's book, at least in part, was about the philosophy of Leo Strauss and his followers, the Straussians. The Straussians have been a subject…
Uh, dude, I call myself conservative, and Bork ain't no leader o'mine. I know what you mean, though.