Robert Novak on Specter

Robert Novak has joined the chorus of dishonesty against Arlen Specter, emphatically repeating the outright lie that Specter said he would impose a litmus test on future judicial nominees that they must be pro-choice and that he said he would block potential appointments. Novak says:

Sen. Arlen Specter, the canny old fox of Pennsylvania politics, got carried away last Wednesday in the flush of an easy fifth-term victory and revealed too much of what he really thinks. He clearly imposed a litmus test requiring support of the Roe vs. Wade abortion decision for Supreme Court nominees at a time when Chief Justice William Rehnquist is gravely ill...

To correct Specter's monumental mistake, his staff put out a news release trying to contradict the senator's undeniable advocacy of a litmus test.

Undeniable advocacy? Not only is it deniable, it's an outright lie. Specter didn't say any such thing, and his track record proves that he has voted dozens, perhaps hundreds, of times for Republican-backed judicial nominees who are anti-abortion. It just blows me away that people like Novak can keep repeating what is demonstrably a flagrant lie, presumably with a straight face.

Novak makes a huge deal out of the fact that Specter did not pledge "unqualified support" of anyone Bush might send up. For crying out loud, Bob, is that what you want? Do you want a senator who says they will vote for anyone, regardless of their views or their competency for the position? Well of course that's what Novak wants. But that's not what any sane or credible person should want.

It is clear to me what is going on here is that the hard right is trying very hard to consolidate their hold on power in the Republican heirarchy. Flush with victory in last week's elections, they are seeking to purge any and all voices of moderation from the halls of power. Nothing but absolute ideological purity is to be allowed. And if they have to lie and distort the positions of even the moderate voices within their own party, so be it. Power, not ethics, is all that matters.

More like this

As I noted yesterday, presumptive Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter has sparked a controversy that has been blown out of all proportion. The editors of the National Review appear to have lost their minds completely over what was, to any sane person, a very innocuous statement. It begins with…
I've said several times lately that the social conservatives, who are playing up the alleged "moral mandate" from the Presidential election, may well overplay their hand and end up getting smacked down by the electorate later for it. Here's a good example of why I think that. The religious right…
I'm finding this story absolutely remarkable, have you noticed? It's just astonishing to me watching this coordinated campaign of stupidity and lies being thrown at Specter. The latest is this letter from a group calling itself, ironically, "Frontiers of Freedom" and signed by a bunch of obscure…
Not content with trying to destroy all moderate voices within the Republican party, religious right groups have now moved on to eating their own for the crime of not being fully on board with their purge for purity. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazzette is reporting that not only are they after Specter,…

So what else is new, Ed?

The hard right has been doing distorting, and generally prevaricating, for over 50 years. The only diference is that now they a great deal less subtle about doing so. They'll even lie about the basis on which the laws of this land are founded.

By Guitar Eddie (not verified) on 08 Nov 2004 #permalink