In response to Friday's Federal district court ruling that struck down that state's anti-gay marriage amendment, Jon Rowe and Kip Esquire both have written thought provoking essays.
Update: Jason Kuznicki and Josh Claybourn also have interesting posts on this ruling.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
These are great examples of why Jason Kuznicki and Jon Rowe are such valuable voices in the blogosphere. Jason posts here and Jon here about gay marriage, liberty and anti-discrimination laws. While I'm not sure their approach is necessarily correct - I frankly haven't thought this issue through…
Jon Rowe is guest blogging at Sandefur's place this week, which is great because I only have to go to one place to find both of their posts for a while. Already, Jon has a great post up about Harry Jaffa and his views of homosexuality, and Timothy has a follow-up to it extending one of the…
Julian Sanchez, the always incisive assistant editor at Reason magazine, has an interesting article about yesterday's California Superior Court ruling that struck down the state's ban on gay marriage as forbidden by that state's constitution. He points out something interesting about the judge's…
John Aravosis of AmericaBlog asks precisely the right question:
Bush says courts shouldn't be permitted to decide who can marry who. That's exactly what happened in Loving v. Virginia, and the public was NOT happy about it. So, rather than pull some cute argument about how blacks aren't like gays,…
Thanks for the link! (Though maybe "Kip" works better than "Esquire"?) ;-)