There's been quite a bit of press attention on alleged euthanasia of terminally ill patients stuck in hospitals in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina came through. The Louisiana attorney general's office is investigating several possible instances of this. Crispin Sartwell has a compelling column on the subject that puts things in perspective. Long quote starts below the fold:
But before we start prosecuting healers for making what must have been the most difficult decisions of their lives, we had better really try to imagine the circumstances they were in.The staff at Memorial had assumed that hospitals would be the highest priority for evacuation. Instead, in one of the innumerable examples of the deep confusion and ineffectuality of the response, they were largely abandoned for days.
CNN quoted Fran Butler, a nurse manager: "It was battle conditions. It was as bad as being out in the field." That is putting it mildly.
There was no power, and hence no monitoring or life-support equipment. The temperatures inside the hospital hovered around 110 degrees during the day. The bodies of those who had died at the hospital before the storm were decomposing. There was no running water, and routine sanitation procedures were impossible.
Family members of patients and staff and people from the neighborhood took shelter in the hospital, and they ran out of food and all other necessities.
In such conditions, terminally ill patients must have suffered immeasurably. And their caregivers must have suffered with them. They were unable to provide even basic palliative care: effective treatment for pain or relief of basic breathing, nutritional or circulatory problems, for instance.
Butler described the staff as desperate and said, "My nurses wanted to know what was the plan? Did they say to put people out of their misery? Yes. ... They wanted to know how to get them out of their misery."
Dr. Bryant King told CNN that at the point of maximum desperation, a second-floor triage area where he was working was cleared of everyone except patients, a hospital administrator and two doctors.
They prayed for guidance, and one of the physicians then produced a handful of syringes. "I don't know what's in the syringes. ... The only thing I heard the physician say was, 'I'm going to give you something to make you feel better,'" King said. King himself refused to participate. Forty-five patients died at Memorial Medical Center in the days following Katrina.
To prosecute doctors or nurses who may have hastened some of those deaths would be obscene. They faced conditions that we cannot really imagine, challenges to their identities and oaths as healers that were impossible to resolve. Whatever decisions they made, they made in prayer: They made in the midst of what could only have been the deepest and most tortured encounter with their own consciences.
I agree with him completely. To prosecute these doctors and nurses would be barbaric and serve no purpose whatsoever. They did what they did out of compassion, not malice.
Hat tip to Radley Balko.
- Log in to post comments
They did what they did out of compassion, not malice.
If they did it.
So far as I've been able to ascertain, the evidence is pretty thin: one statement from a doctor not directly involved who said he overheard discussions about euthanasia, and an supposed participant quoted anonymously in a British tabloid. My understanding is that the autopsies could provide no confirmatory evidence one way or the other, because of the conditions of the bodies. The investigation may have come up with more information, but (as lease as far as I know) it's not been leaked.