Rowe and Kuznicki on Gay Marriage and Liberty

These are great examples of why Jason Kuznicki and Jon Rowe are such valuable voices in the blogosphere. Jason posts here and Jon here about gay marriage, liberty and anti-discrimination laws. While I'm not sure their approach is necessarily correct - I frankly haven't thought this issue through very well at all - they offer a point of view you don't often hear, especially from people who are directly affected by such discrimination. They help us understand that the issue isn't quite as simple as we might like to believe. Stil, I love the comment that Jason quotes for sheer snarkiness:

We pro-gay rights folks promise to treat you anti-gay people at least as well as you have treated gay people. Enjoy. And remember, you're always free to change your lifestyle choice.

Zing.

Tags

More like this

MAJeff here, getting all gay and stuff. It's been a pretty big year for LGBT folks in the U.S. A couple weeks ago, the state in which I live repealed a law enacted during the height of anti-miscegination activity, and is now allowing same-sex couples from anywhere to marry here. Prior to that,…
MAJeff here, getting all gay and stuff. It's been a pretty big year for LGBT folks in the U.S. A couple weeks ago, the state in which I live repealed a law enacted during the height of anti-miscegination activity, and is now allowing same-sex couples from anywhere to marry here. Prior to that,…
A bit of an argument has erupted among my closest blog neighbors over the question of gay marriage and polygamy. It began with Jon Rowe's post last month in which he argued that the arguments for gay marriage do not necessarily lead logically to the acceptance of polygamous marriages. Jon was not…
One of the law professors on the ReligionLaw listserv posted a link to a journal article on SSRN by George Dent of Case Western Reserve University. The article, entitled Civil Rights for Whom? Gay Rights Versus Religious Freedom, reminded me of Dorothy Parker's famous one line book review - "This…

It's like this guy totally stole my line. When arguing with people in message boards about this, I told them that I thought that I agreed with them that rights shouldn't be created in the constitution simply to protect someone's lifestyle choices, and therefore the 1st amendment protecting religion should be abolished.

By beervolcano (not verified) on 17 Jun 2006 #permalink