Kuznicki on Flag Burning

Don't our representatives have more important things to spend our tax funded hours on.... like maybe keepin them damn homos from gettin' hitched or keepin the damn hippies from smokin' them maryjewana cigarettes when they get a belly ache.

I mean come on, lets git some priorities.

Article one establishes the legislature, which is clearly important and pretty hard to do without if you want to call yourself a representative democracy. It also sets out the things that the legislature may do, as well as enshrining the principle that if you read with a healthy imagination, you may do whatever you wish. Which is important when legislators run out of stuff to do.

WTF?

Don't our representatives have more important things to spend our tax funded hours on....

Not when it comes to wanting to cling on to power.

The silliness of a flag burning amendment becomes apparent when you start considering ways to circumvent the amendment.

For example, say Mr. Joe Nation burns a flag that was made with 49 stars, or 14 strips, or a dark, dark blug stipes, or 6 pointed stars or a square flag or a flag with red strips of 2" and blue stripes of 1".

None of these would satisfy a definition of the the Flag but the act of burning any of these pseudo-flags would likely generate the same reactions in a person that wants to outlaw flag descecration.

Geez, what if someone put beautiful gold buting and piping on the borders?

A flag descreation amendment is a terrible idea in so many ways.

What is the definition of "The Flag". First, does it have to have some exact dimensions? Do the colors have to match exactly? to what? where are they specified? If you take a picture of a "flag" and print the picture, is that a "flag". If you draw a good picture of a flag, is that a "flag"? What if you draw a not-so-good picture? What if a 10 year old draws a picture of a flag, doesn't like it and crumbles it up, has he desecrated a "flag"? And on and on. The problem is absence of understanding about the distinction between an idea and a symbol used to represent the idea. I used to teach high school math. I tried to get across the idea about the distinction between a number and a numeral. I would write the numeral "4â³ on the board and then erase it. And I would ask - have I destroyed the number "4â³? Same distinction here. The flag is a symbol (a numeral), it REPRESENTS an idea - the idea of a "free" society "with liberty and justice for all". If we destroy (erase) a "flag" have we destroyed the idea? (Certainly not as much as the actions of the administration are doing).

Let's all remember that the proper, respectful, way to dispose of an old American flag is burning. That makes anti-flag burning laws really about trying to suppress the ideas that might be being expressed by those burning of the flag in a protest (something I personally would not do), not the act of burning itself.

Thought crime anyone?

Bill --

I'm sorry you didn't appreciate my humor. I hope I'll do better next time.