I find this really funny. Ralph Reed is blaming John McCain for his loss in the primaries in the race to be Lt. Governor of Georgia, according to National Review:
Here's the view of what happened from the Reed camp: Once the Abramoff stuff exploded, it was going to be a very tough road for Reed. Glen Bolger did a poll for the campaign in January showing that it was possible for Reed to win, but his negatives were very high and he would have to squeak by. Reed had a choice to make, and decided to stay in the race and try to make it happen. In the end, soft Republicans appear to have broken very strongly against him in the suburbs. There may have been some cross-over Democratic votes in the open primary, but that alone can't account for a 54-46% loss. Reed's connection to the Abramoff stuff had broken back in the summer of 2004, so it couldn't have been predicted that it would be such a huge deal even now. But it was. The Reed camp blames John McCain for playing payback for his 2000 primary defeat with a campaign of leaks, and the press, of course, was happy to pile on. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ran dozens and dozens of stories about the scandal. Outside liberal groups might have spent upwards of a quarter-million on the race. The Reed team felt good at the close of the race, but, in the end, they just couldn't scratch it out.
Right. It couldn't be because you're a scumbag pretending to be the voice of righteousness. It couldn't be that you were selling yourself to felons and being a flagrant hypocrite. Nah. Must be someone else's fault.
- Log in to post comments
Yeah nevermind the ties to scamming indian tribes or African American churches.
In some Republican circles, scamming Indian tribes and African American churches would be considered a feature.
Republicans do like to win, occasionally, however -- and they realized that this guy was dead meat in November. It's almost too bad the scandals didn't break until after he won the primary . . .
I guess we owe McCain our thanks.
"soft Republicans appear to have broken very strongly against him in the suburbs"
"Soft Republicans"? Is that the new label for republicans who no longer want to be associated with hypocrisy?
No, "soft" Republicans are those who actually use their brain cells, instead of ideology.