Tortured Canadian on No Fly List

The outrage for Maher Arar continues. Arar is the Canadian man who was captured by American authorities on a false tip from Canadian law enforcement, sent to Syria and tortured for 10 months before being released. He is completely innocent, as a Canadian board of inquiry showed recently. And to add insult to injury, quite literally, he could not fly to the United States recently to accept a human rights award because he's still on the government's no-fly list. He accepted by videotape instead:

He broke down in tears during a videotaped acceptance speech at the National Press Club, when he was describing his imprisonment and the beatings he endured during 10 months spent mostly in a filthy "grave" in Syria.

He said "life in the cell was impossible" and that he contemplated suicide as soon as he realized he was in Syria.

The beatings were so painful, he said, that "I forgot every moment I enjoyed in my life."

"Since my release, I have been suffering from anxiety, constant fear and depression. My life will never be the same again. But I promised myself one thing, that I will continue my quest for justice as long as I have a breath."

And what is it that he wants?

Arar, who participated by telephone in an afternoon news conference at the policy institute, said he wants U.S. officials to accept the findings of the Canadian report and remove his name and his wife's from the list.

"First they will have to acknowledge what they did was wrong and, second, they have to hold those people accountable."

Arar, who's appealing a U.S. lawsuit that was dismissed by a federal judge, said he has just one simple question for President George W. Bush.

"Knowing that Syria tortures people . . . why did they send me to that country?"

The report from O'Connor said U.S. officials, acting on faulty intelligence from Canadians, violated the Vienna convention on Consular Relations by shipping Arar off to Syria without telling Canada.

"The responsibility is shared between the Canadian officials and American authorities," said Arar, who is also seeking compensation from Canada for his ordeal.

"I think everyone recognizes so far I have lost four years of my life. I have not been able to find a job. Hopefully we'll be able to reach some kind of fair settlement with the government."

And how is the US government handling the situation?

The U.S. has acknowledged that Arar was a victim of what is known as rendition and Ottawa has lodged a formal complaint with the Bush administration over his treatment.

John Cavanagh, director of the IPS, said he wrote to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to ask that Arar be removed from the no-fly list.

"I am, alas, not surprised that I received no reply."

Very nice. "We didn't let him fly, but we can't acknowledge that he's on the no-fly list." Here's the tragic fact: Maher Arar is not the only innocent man tortured for absolutely no reason, based solely on a false tip from someone. These are real people, with children and wives and friends, and they have been tortured. This is not an abstraction, not some anonymous brown person on the other side of the world that you can dismiss as just another faceless bad guy. And this must stop. And those who did it must be held accountable.

More like this

This week, many things have been happening up north. The most important being ... from the NY Times, Canadian Court Limits Detention in Terror Cases : Canada's highest court on Friday unanimously struck down a law that allows the Canadian government to detain foreign-born terrorism suspects…
In case you were wondering, Trump is telling you lies. Syria is run by a horrible dictator. He is the kind of dictator that makes you want to bring back assassination of foreign leaders. The idea of putting him down is hardly an extreme one, once you know what he does and has done. There was a…
Tara and Revere have posts up today on the story of the anonymous jackass of Air France Flight 385 and Czech Air flight 104. His story has been all over the news lately - he's the idiot with extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) who took two intercontinental flights after being…
Apparently either Jo-anne or I share a name with, or similar to, someone on the U.S. government's secret terrorist watch list.  I can't say which of us it is; no one at the airport is authorized to tell us that. All I know is we were prevented from checking in at the Tucson airport on Thursday…

Surely, the our government might keep out just because he intends to sue us.

No, we're braver than that.

By Jim Ramsey (not verified) on 20 Oct 2006 #permalink

Even more tragic, this treatment of non-American citizens as enemy combatants without right to any sort of trial, and subject to "interrogation methods" was codified into American law by president Bush this week.

I'm not surprised there was no reply, the AG:AG would have to appologize for doing something utterly immoral, yet now completely legal.

And of course its going to get better with Bush signing S. 3930.

When will someone put a leash on this dog?

By Gene Goldring (not verified) on 20 Oct 2006 #permalink

That dog is rabid and violent. He needs to be impeached and tried for war crimes at the very least.

Would this story suffice as an article in the indictment?

That's what I want to know.

No Fly List: The illusion of protection, covering the enablement of persecution.

I'm not sure that most of the innocent were tortured for no reason. It has been reported that 5,000 good green American reasons were provided for an Afghan to decide that a useless no kin of mine goatherd from the the next village was Taliban/AlQueda.

I love it.

They can't do anything so simple as removing an exonerated person from their no-fly list.

And we're to give the administration the benefit of the doubt as to whether they will give detainees a fair trial????

By Miguelito (not verified) on 20 Oct 2006 #permalink

They can't do anything so simple as removing an exonerated person from their no-fly list.

And this shows that they can be trusted to protect us? Riiiiiiiggghhhhht.

No-fly list: there is a major procedural problem here (one of many!). The _only_ provision for getting off the list is that the specific agent who put you on it is the only person who can take you off it. BUT neither that agent's name nor his agency is recorded by your entry, so there is no way to determine who it was in order to be removed. Nobody else is allowed to make the change, so nobody does. And is the agent likely to 'fess up in this environment? Well, pigs flew at the Roger Waters concert last week, so just maybe ....

Google "TSA list procedure" for a selection of articles, government and otherwise, on the issue.

By david1947 (not verified) on 21 Oct 2006 #permalink