Orac Shreds Chopra

I have a confession to make: I have a passionate hatred for Deepak Chopra. I think the man is a complete and utter fraud. So I'm always glad to see people give him the thorough reeming he deserves so much. Orac has a good one here. Chopra is someone whose funeral I would actually protest outside of. The guy has spent a lifetime telling people that their "quantum power" can allow them to live forever. When he dies, a few signs calling him a fraud seems pretty reasonable to me. And perhaps the millions he has earned fleecing the credulous can be put to some good use.

More like this

I have a Twitter account, and there's nothing special about it except one nuisance: Dennis Markuze/David Mabus spams it constantly, creating dozens of new accounts every day and sending me hundreds of messages every day, typically repetitive stuff on the lines of "You are a NAZI!" and "We're going…
It's hard not to crack a cheerful smile at this story, but do try to take it seriously. A coven of Westboro Baptist anti-gay kooks went off to protest outside a soldier's funeral in Oklahoma, and returned to their car to find their tires slashed. When they drove into town on the flat tires anyway,…
I'm sure I've done more than enough wibbling about TED for this week, but the only major physics story at the moment involved the Higgs boson, and I'm thoroughly sick of that. So let's talk about Malcolm Gladwell and journosplaining. Gladwell has a new book out, David and Goliath that from all…
While I am laying down the law regarding the proper usage of controversial words, allow me to express a few thoughts about spirituality. P.Z. Myers gave this post, in which he comments on the awarding of the Templeton Prize, the following title: “Spirituality?” Another Word for Lies and Empty Noise…

Chopra is someone whose funeral I would actually protest outside of.

I'd pour a glass of whiskey on the grave, after filterin' it through me kidneys.

Deepak Chopra and his ilk may be (loosely) termed the "Spiritual Left's" answer to the Religious Right's Creationism. It's another attempt to merge science and religion by claiming that "materialistic mainstream scientists" aren't as open, informed, and downright scientific as people who aren't afraid to let ALL of reality inform our science theories, and bring in the supernatural truths.

What "confession?" I'm not at all surprised you don't like Chopra. Bad science is bad science, and the smugness and self-righteousness seems to be the same whether we're dealing with New Age or Fundamentalist.

I can't stand this touchy-feely mishmash of science and new agism either.
Anyone see that ridiculous "What the bleep do we know?"
Sheesh!

I concur. Chopra is a fraud, and an idiot. Exhibits A and B:

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/10/deepak_chopra_does_it_again…

http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/moonbat_anti_evolutionist_d…

He's made millions selling people lies. Fundamentally, what he does is no different than what evangelical Christians do, he just presents it in wishy-washy, feel-good rhetoric that appeals to more progressive, even secular people.

Deepak Chopra will never "die" -- when his biological processes stop functioning, he will "move to a higher plane of existence" or "become one with the universe through the quantization of his conscious essence." (My bet is on the latter)