Here's a case where the Christian legal groups are absolutely right. A kids dance group was prevented from taking part in a holiday festival in Chula Vista, California, because their shirts bore a religious message. The American Family Association Center for Law and Policy filed suit on their behalf and the city just settled the case. The really good part of the settlement is that the city has agreed to put police officers and city officials through first amendment training to prevent it from happening again. I think that's a great idea and ought to be done in every school and city in the nation.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Continuing on the theme from the other day, here are more examples of the innumerable cases where, contrary to the absurd rhetoric of the likes of Joseph Farah, the ACLU has defended the free exercise rights of Christians and Christian organizations. Here's a story about how the ACLU of Nevada has…
The WorldNutDaily is reporting on a Federal court case involving Palm Beach, Florida, where they allowed a Jewish menorrah to be displayed in a public park, but refused to allow a Christian nativity scene. Both were paid for with private funds. The city was obviously wrong to do so and they have…
Not that this will surprise anyone, but even when he's right, he can't seem to avoid misrepresenting what the ACLU says or does. In this post at STACLU, he cites a column by Nat Hentoff (one of my absolute favorite writers) where Hentoff takes the ACLU to task for inconsistency in a pair of cases,…
Over at the Panda's Thumb, there's a troll by the name of Larry Fafarman who has been posting under about 50 different names, using proxies to evade a ban. He's apparently posting under the name J Simes now and he's trying, both valiantly and absurdly, to defend the Manzari and Cooper article and…
Here is one for you. Sounds like she may have a case...
Stuff like this drives me nuts. Every year I have students come to me asking,
"Can [insert teacher's name] force me/someone to stand for/say the pledge?"
To which I reply, "no, they can't force you to do either."
Yet the very next year? Same question, same problems.
Yes, if the allegations in that article are true, that student has a very strong case.
OK, Ed, then how about this question: do the other students in the class who were told to send the letters and who did have a case as well? Isn't it irrelevent, really, whether they support gay adoption rights or not, because the professor had no right to order them as part of a manditory class assignment, to send a letter in support of any assigned position to a legislator? Not an atty, so perhaps not, but if not, I wonder why not?
This Yellow Dog Democrat knows that if any professor had required me to write a letter to the legislators endorsing a Democratic-sponsored bill with which I agreed, I'd still have flat refused. [If the assignment was to write a letter regarding a current legislative issue --- topic unspecified --- that would be another matter.] But I don't think he could legitimately require a student to publically endorse even a position the student supported.
Yes, there is no way a professor should be able to force anyone to write a letter like that. But there are more allegations from her that make it even worse. She says that when she refused to sign the letter she was called before the school ethics committee. That makes it much worse.
Ed: Indeed it does....
The really good part of the settlement is that the city has agreed to put police officers and city officials through first amendment training to prevent it from happening again.
I have rather sincere problems believing that the police officers aren't already trained in legal matters. These may include 1st amendment issues, but it is unclear the extent to which they would get involved in 1st amendment issues regarding religion. "Peaceful assembly" would be more likely issues for the police.
City officials are another matter. They should be trained to call on city legal counsel for legal issues. Frankly, I am surprised that they don't have a handbook describing what they should do.
afarensis | November 2, 2006 08:52 PM
The case you linked to seems somewhat odd. The student sued after she had graduated. I suspect that there is something more going on there that was not reported.
Sounds great. Now can they go through training in the rest of the Bill of Rights, as well? Like, for example, the 4th Amendment?