Conservative Hypocrisy on Education

One of the mantras for conservatives for decades when it comes to education is the importance of local control. So adamant were they about this that conservative politicians have long run on platforms advocating the elimination of the Department of Education completely. Indeed, the 1996 Republican Party Platform contained this item:

"The Federal Government has no constitutional authority to be involved in school curricula or to control jobs in the marketplace. That is why we will abolish the Department of Education."

The year before that, in fact, conservatives in Congress attempted to do exactly that. The bill that Clinton vetoed that resulted in shutting down the Federal government for quite some time (and, incidentally, led to him meeting Monica Lewinsky over pizza and a good 5 cent cigar) would have all but abolished the DOE. So they finally get control of both houses of Congress and the White House and what they do they do? Pass the most significant increase in Federal control over education in history.

And on top of that, of course, is the fact that they're now tying Federal sex education funds to the requirement that schools teach abstinence only. This is precisely the sort of Federal control that conservatives screamed about for decades and now they're engaging in it themselves. And we don't hear a peep about it from all those social conservatives. Because it's not really about Federal control at all, it's about their agenda and advancing it by any means possible.

More like this

Judge Birch's bold upbraiding of the President and the Congress over the unconstitutional "Terri's Law", which attempted to tell the courts what sort of decision rules they should apply in a case, has attracted some interesting responses. Stephen Henderson's article on the opinion in the Knight-…
While we're on the subject of the Cato Institute, it's worth checking out their new report, written by Gene Healy and Tim Lynch, about Bush's abysmal track record on constitutional matters. It's funny, just a few months ago I had a hardcore liberal accuse me of being a "primitive reactionary" for…
Rusty Lopez has reacted to my post about Bush backing away from the Federal Marriage Amendment with this strangely myopic post. He says: Speaking of venturing out of the "ghetto," Ed Brayton, over at Dispatches from the Culture Wars, seems to think that because President Bush is now not pushing…
Washington Monthly has an interesting set of essays by prominent conservatives on why they want the Republicans to lose in November. Joe Scarborough writes of the virtues of divided government during the 90s: The fact that both parties hated each another was healthy for our republic's bottom line.…

What else is new. Jeesh. They're completely morally bankrupt. The only thing that could surprise me now is a revelation that Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum is secretly having Man on Dog sex.

...with Ted Haggard?

But... but...when the government is only instituting the WILL OF THE PEOPLE, that doesn't count as government control, does it?