Is that a subatomic particle or are you just happy to see me?

The World Wide Web began at the Swiss nuclear research facility, CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), and that may be its biggest claim to fame. But CERN really is a nuclear research facility and is home to some of the most advanced technologies for probing the inner workings of matter, especially sub-atomic particles. For example, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is located there. Hadrons are composite subatomic particles composed of quarks. They come in two flavors, baryons (three quarks) and Mesons (a quark and an anti-quark). We learn in Wikipedia that hadrons are "single particle excitations of the basic theory of strong interactions." How do you study excited hadrons? You could use the LHC, slated to be completed in May 2008. But that might only be good for single particle excitations. What if the subatomic particle were really excited? Then, according to the New York Times, you might want to use the Large Hardon Collider.

While the Large Hadron Collider is familiar to elementary particle physicists, the Large Hardon Collider seems to be new. Thanks to a hat tip on Boingboing, we managed to find a diagram at http://largehardoncollider.com/:

i-2defde8392813d108eb9e229e2a90f0f-lhc.small.jpg

You can read more about the Hardon Colllider here.

Tags

More like this

The arguably wacky premise behind a New York Times article this Saturday is that the Large Hadron Collider (LHR)--slated to be the world's most impressive particle accelerator when it's up and running later this year--could inadvertently produce an Earth-destroying black hole. Or, that's at least…
This guest post is written by BNL theoretical physicist Raju Venugopalan. After earning his Ph.D. from Stony Brook University in 1992, Venugopalan worked at several universities in the United States and at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark, before joining Brookhaven in 1998. He is the…
The good news: Despite their best efforts, the folks at CERN failed to produce a black hole that sucked the entire earth into it! That would have been cool. The bad news is for string theory. What might be one of the few empirical tests for that tangle of math and stuff seems to have come out…
The positive and sometimes unexpected impact of particle physics is well documented, from physicists inventing the World Wide Web to engineering the technology underlying life-saving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices. But sometimes the raw power of huge experiments and scientific ambition…

Finally, I think I understand the Hadron collider. The above diagram was very helpful.

This article must surely have been sourced from Master Bates.

Science rules!

By C. Porter (not verified) on 02 Apr 2008 #permalink

Revere, you are clearly a pervert. Without people like you and me, the word almost surely not exist, and an entire sector of psychology would also not exist! But does anybody ever give us any award or express any sort of appreciation at all? No-o-o-o-o. I guess all we can do is keep trying ...

Hahahaha, you're a bunch of penis heads.