[New readers: the Freethinker Sermonette is a weekly feature here. If atheism bothers you, you can skip it. But please don't complain it has nothing to do with science. In our view, it has everything to do with science. The rest of you, enjoy.]
PZ over at Pharyngula has the most appropriate post for this week's Freethinker Sermonette (plus it provides a nice link to scibling Nick Anthis's terrific post on the mechanism of a kind of antiviral resistance exhibited by the swine flu virus). I'll just settle for Bill Maher's little diatribe. The swine flu part starts at about 1:45 minutes:
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Ray Comfort has made a post on the swine flu. You know already what kind of idiotic tripe he's going to trot out.
The spread of the so-called 'swine flu' demonstrates yet again how useless and sometimes deadly a mutation can be. Furthermore, as the infection spreads around the world, the search for…
Yesterday DemFromCT had another in his continuing series at DailyKos on Flu and You (Part VIII). He extended an earlier post (part II) on a critical piece of public health infrastructure, laboratory surveillance. One of the graphics is this chart of influenza positive tests reported to the CDC by…
There is no way to keep up with all the flu news, so we pick and choose, usually based on some kind of point we want to make. That's both the good and the bad of this blog: the news comes with a point of view. But so does most news, and we try to make ours both explicit and scientifically as…
Welcome to our new house at ScienceBlogs. We trust our old readers had no trouble with the directions to get here. You can wander off to the kitchen and fix yourself a drink while we introduce ourselves to our new neighbors.
We describe EM as a forum for argument and discussion about progressive…
I really like Bill. Makes me think of people who go through cancer treatment and when they get better, they thank god. Just slap the doctor in the face.
bc, you know a lot of doctors think they're god. Maybe that's why.
Dear Revere(s), when you get a chance, can you comment on the race to develop a new technology for vaccine production. Our local paper just reported on how this is being done http://www.mercurynews.com/swine-flu/ci_12282721 I would have thought that growing it in non-egg culture would result in a safer vaccine. What can go wrong with vaccine production to cause those nasty side effects? Thanks
Carolyn: Big question, but if you look in our past posts you'll get some idea. They all had the "Vaccines" category tag.
Thanks for the shout-out, and keep up the good work!
Totally off topic, but as a break from flu, do you have any comments on the Hydroxycut recall?
The short answer, I think, to Carolyn's question about side-effects is that a small percentage of humans are allergic to egg albumen and so giving them flu vaccine with proteins from egg will do more harm than good.
I think the point of Carolyn's question is that the vaccine she's talking about isn't cultured in eggs.