I only post this because this is the sort of meaningless, unintelligible science journalism that drives me nuts. It doesn't really elucidate anything to the general public and it offers no details for the experts. I don't even know exactly what the findings were, because based on the article, this is nothing new. This is what happens when science education goes downhill I suppose.
EDIT 5/30/08: Looks like someone decided to do a little more indepth article on the research. This is a much better take on it.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This is flagged as a ResearchBlogging post, but it's a different sort of research than I usually write up here, as this is a paper from Physical Review Special Topics-- Physics Education Research. This is, however, a legitimate and growing area of research in physics departments, and some of the…
Janet Stemwedel and Chad Orzel have each written excellent posts on the necessity of improving science journalism. Janet argues that what's needed is to improve science education:
If there were an actual clamor for science reporting that was detailed, informative, and grounded in fact -- a clamor…
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." -Frank Zappa
One of the most difficult things to talk about, for any self-respecting scientist, is politics. Like all of you, I have my preferences, my…
It's always amusing to wander over to the Discovery Institute's blogs, and see what kind of nonsense they're spouting today. So, today, as I'm feeling like steamed crap, I took a wander over. And what did I find? High grade, low-content rubbish from my old buddy, Casey Luskin. Luskin is,…